6.8 Western

They all work and it's just splitting hairs between 270, 7mm and 308. Hit fairly in the lungs there will be zero difference in killing power between the Berger examples shown here. I prefer the 277 bore and others 7mm or 30 cal, just pick the one you like and go hunting.
 
24" and why..

I've never noticed a big difference between 20" up to 24"

It's when the bbl length hits 26" do I feel the elongated pain in the ass.

I've hunted with them all...
Remimgton Mohawks, model 7's,
to 26" Weatherby’s and even a 26" plus a brake and many in between...

I'm in PA and it can get very forestry here in areas.

When I've found the foliage too thick for a 24" it was also a pain in the ass for a 20" as well.
Thus I take a pistol if I'm hunting that stuff.

Would you possiby have any regret if ______.
Going with one or the other ?
Thanks for sharing what your thoughts, much appreciated. I definitely know I would not like anything longer than 24", going up the mountain with my 24" Whelen strapped to my pack can be annoying going through the thick stuff. One day I'll probably bob the barrel.

Your question at the end about would I regret a 22 over a 24"? No I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of speed for something shorter that fits on my pack a bit better.
 
Thanks for sharing what your thoughts, much appreciated. I definitely know I would not like anything longer than 24", going up the mountain with my 24" Whelen strapped to my pack can be annoying going through the thick stuff. One day I'll probably bob the barrel.

Your question at the end about would I regret a 22 over a 24"? No I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of speed for something shorter that fits on my pack a bit better.
I thought I had something on the end of my post at the very end but something happened.


I meant to add this....

One thought is if you get a 24" and you find yourself wishing for less that can be remedied.
If you start with a 22" you can't go up with it sans a complete re- barrel.

Hell we cant defy father time you might find yourself wishing for 20" at some point and now you have to get to get it cut anyways.
If I missed it apologies...

what rifle are you aiming for
 
I thought I had something on the end of my post at the very end but something happened.


I meant to add this....

One thought is if you get a 24" and you find yourself wishing for less that can be remedied.
If you start with a 22" you can't go up with it sans a complete re- barrel.

Hell we cant defy father time you might find yourself wishing for 20" at some point and now you have to get to get it cut anyways.
If I missed it apologies...

what rifle are you aiming for
yeah, it's a lot easier cutting 2" off than adding a couple...
 
Well, it ain't going to beat as much of the stuffing out of you during long strings of fire, that's for sure

So, in what world is a 7mm fast twist better than a 30cal fast twist
I guess I don't mind the either, but with great bullets I have never seen 30's do any better on stuff up to elk than similar 7's. You have to really pump up a 30 to get the same BC/Speed as you can do with a 7mm.
 
I'm 63 and enjoy shooting my 338 RUM. I hope that doesn't change.

JD338
 
A new cartridge will always have a following of sorts but for it to really catch multiple firearms manufactures need to chamber it. The 6.5 Creedmoor is a good example. I personally like the 260 Remington better but it never got the same chambering. I'm thinking a 260 Ackley Improved for my next build.
 
That's why my .338RUM sits in the Gun Cabinet a lot more. I do remember in the past firing a few sighting shots prior to Elk Season. It was six shots if I remember correctly. After that I had to start nursing a headache.
That's a major reason I let my 375 Ruger go. It was well made and very accurate but the stock fit wasn't right. Figured recoil headaches probably weren't a good thing. My 35 Whelen is my "heavy" gun now, a 6.8 Western with those long for caliber bullets at decent speeds will kill a moose a lot farther than I'm going to realistically shoot.
 
Back
Top