Michael C. Smith
Beginner
- May 24, 2016
- 220
- 1
Could some run quick load for me please with this bullet and a 20inch barrel with varget imr 4064 imr 4895. Thank you.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-10.0 89 39.60 2545 1869 41873 9614 95.0 1.155
-09.0 90 40.04 2572 1909 43142 9726 95.4 1.138
-08.0 91 40.48 2598 1949 44448 9837 95.8 1.122
-07.0 92 40.92 2625 1989 45792 9945 96.2 1.106
-06.0 93 41.36 2652 2030 47175 10050 96.6 1.091
-05.0 94 41.80 2679 2071 48600 10152 96.9 1.076
-04.0 95 42.24 2705 2113 50066 10252 97.2 1.061
-03.0 96 42.68 2732 2154 51576 10349 97.5 1.046 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 97 43.12 2758 2196 53131 10443 97.8 1.032 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 98 43.56 2785 2239 54732 10533 98.1 1.018 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 99 44.00 2811 2282 56382 10621 98.4 1.004 ! Near Maximum !
+01.0 100 44.44 2838 2325 58081 10705 98.6 0.991 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 101 44.88 2864 2368 59832 10787 98.8 0.977 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 102 45.32 2891 2412 61636 10864 99.0 0.964 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 103 45.76 2917 2456 63496 10938 99.2 0.951 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 104 46.20 2943 2500 65413 11009 99.4 0.939 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 99 44.00 2930 2478 66059 10432 100.0 0.936 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 99 44.00 2653 2031 46888 10330 93.0 1.092
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-10.0 84 39.60 2547 1873 39730 10115 94.9 1.189
-09.0 85 40.04 2575 1913 40936 10237 95.3 1.172
-08.0 86 40.48 2602 1954 42176 10356 95.7 1.155
-07.0 87 40.92 2629 1996 43452 10473 96.1 1.139
-06.0 88 41.36 2657 2037 44765 10587 96.5 1.123
-05.0 89 41.80 2684 2079 46117 10698 96.8 1.107
-04.0 90 42.24 2711 2121 47507 10805 97.2 1.092
-03.0 91 42.68 2738 2164 48938 10910 97.5 1.077
-02.0 92 43.12 2765 2207 50411 11012 97.8 1.062
-01.0 93 43.56 2792 2251 51927 11110 98.1 1.047 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 93 44.00 2819 2294 53487 11205 98.4 1.033 ! Near Maximum !
+01.0 94 44.44 2846 2338 55093 11296 98.6 1.019 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 95 44.88 2873 2383 56747 11384 98.8 1.005 ! Near Maximum !
+03.0 96 45.32 2900 2427 58449 11468 99.0 0.991 ! Near Maximum !
+04.0 97 45.76 2926 2472 60203 11548 99.2 0.978 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 98 46.20 2953 2517 62009 11624 99.4 0.965 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 93 44.00 2948 2508 63470 10992 100.0 0.957 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 93 44.00 2646 2021 43753 10863 92.6 1.131
Michael C. Smith":2sgmqstz said:Thank you both for the help. Looks like the 4895 might be the better powder if it is accurate.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk