Ruger LC9
- Thread starter Vince
- Start date
- Nov 4, 2004
- 24,272
- 6,487
I have an LC9. Easy to carry and conceal but the trigger is terrible.
Get the LC9s with the striker bar, it has a much improved trigger.
JD338
Get the LC9s with the striker bar, it has a much improved trigger.
JD338
- Thread starter
- #3
- Thread starter
- #4
I compared the LC9 with the new Glock single stack 9mm.
Liked the feel of the Ruger in my hand better and it seemed to point better.
The Ruger is also a hair length shorter than the Glock. That makes a difference when carrying a gun in your pocket.
The Glock comes with two magazines. The triggers are about the same as the Ruger is the "Pro" model with no external safety.
The Ruger is more rounded. Think of a bar of soap with no sharp edges versus 90 degree angles. Also in favor of the Ruger is that it's a little less expensive.
I'll have to try to shoot both of these before making my final decision. I'm also going to look at Trijicon and Crimson Trace to see what accessories are available for each model.
Vince
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Liked the feel of the Ruger in my hand better and it seemed to point better.
The Ruger is also a hair length shorter than the Glock. That makes a difference when carrying a gun in your pocket.
The Glock comes with two magazines. The triggers are about the same as the Ruger is the "Pro" model with no external safety.
The Ruger is more rounded. Think of a bar of soap with no sharp edges versus 90 degree angles. Also in favor of the Ruger is that it's a little less expensive.
I'll have to try to shoot both of these before making my final decision. I'm also going to look at Trijicon and Crimson Trace to see what accessories are available for each model.
Vince
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Vince,
Don't overlook the S&W M&P Shield. The LC9 was in the running when I was looking for my wife. We shot both and the Shield won hands down. Felt recoil, trigger, controls, and sights, all better than the LC9. It is also more comfortable in the hand as well. The trigger on the one we got is great out of the box and it is extremely accurate. Zero reliability issues with 115 thru 147gr loads.
Don't overlook the S&W M&P Shield. The LC9 was in the running when I was looking for my wife. We shot both and the Shield won hands down. Felt recoil, trigger, controls, and sights, all better than the LC9. It is also more comfortable in the hand as well. The trigger on the one we got is great out of the box and it is extremely accurate. Zero reliability issues with 115 thru 147gr loads.
- Thread starter
- #6
- Thread starter
- #9
I think you are looking a size too big then. Though the LC9, Shield, Glock, and the mentioned Kahr's are sub compacts they are all a little large for pocket use. You may need to be looking at the LCP, Bodyguard, P238 and mustang type pistols. Flat and small they fit nicely in the back pocket. I carry the shield in a IWB and my Kimber in an SOB.
- Thread starter
- #12
- Nov 4, 2004
- 24,272
- 6,487
Vince,
The LC9 is easy to conceal but I would not call it a pocket pistol.
For that, you need to go one size smaller, like the LCP.
JD338
The LC9 is easy to conceal but I would not call it a pocket pistol.
For that, you need to go one size smaller, like the LCP.
JD338
- Thread starter
- #14
The smallest of the 9mm single stacks i've seen is the Diamondback DB9. My brother has one and loves it and it is very accurate for a small auto and has a good trigger as well. It's really small for a 9mm so it's a little snappy on the shot due to it's size which is to be expected. He claims that he has put well over 400rds through his and it hasn't missed a beat so far. If I were in the market for a small 9mm I would look into the Diamondback but I already have a Khar CM9 and a Glock43. The Diamondback is smaller than both of mine. You may want to check them out.
- Thread starter
- #16
- Thread starter
- #17
- Thread starter
- #18
- Nov 4, 2004
- 24,272
- 6,487
How does it shoot? What is your carry load?
JD338
JD338
- Thread starter
- #20
