35 Whelen QL request

J

Jimbeaux82

Handloader
Jan 6, 2011
403
152
Would one of our erstwhile members please run a QL for 35 Whelen, Hornady cases, 180 gr Barnes TTSX, cci 200, IMR 4064, 24" barrel?

Also, does anyone have experience with the 180 gr TTSX for deer in 35 Whelen and how did it perform?

TIA

Jimbeaux
 
Code: 
Cartridge          : .35 Whelen
Bullet             : .358, 180, Barnes 'X' S 35810
Useable Case Capaci: 64.752 grain H2O = 4.204 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : IMR 4064

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   97    54.63   2646    2798   42503   6625     91.6    1.170
-09.0   98    55.24   2674    2858   43779   6706     92.1    1.157
-08.0   99    55.84   2702    2918   45093   6786     92.6    1.143
-07.0  100    56.45   2730    2979   46446   6864     93.0    1.130
-06.0  101    57.06   2758    3040   47840   6941     93.5    1.117
-05.0  102    57.67   2786    3103   49276   7016     93.9    1.104
-04.0  103    58.27   2814    3166   50758   7090     94.3    1.091  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0  104    58.88   2842    3229   52292   7161     94.7    1.078  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0  106    59.49   2871    3294   53880   7231     95.1    1.066  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0  107    60.09   2899    3359   55525   7299     95.5    1.053  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  108    60.70   2927    3424   57229   7366     95.9    1.041  ! Near Maximum !
+01.0  109    61.31   2955    3491   58994   7430     96.2    1.029  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0  110    61.91   2983    3558   60823   7492     96.6    1.017  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0  111    62.52   3012    3625   62719   7552     96.9    1.005  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0  112    63.13   3040    3694   64685   7609     97.2    0.993  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0  113    63.74   3068    3763   66724   7664     97.5    0.982  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    108    60.70   3065    3755   67103   7377     99.4    0.982  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    108    60.70   2751    3025   47552   7039     89.1    1.129
 
Dr Mike,

as always you are on the ball. I would think that the TTSX with its "bands" might develop a little less pressure with powder charge due to less contact area than the original "x" bullets referenced.

Thanks

Jimbeaux
 
Apologies are in order. I was rushing since I'm playing nurse for a few months. That's what happens when you wife decides to jump off the roof (don't ask). Here's the correct data.

Code: 
Cartridge          : .35 Whelen
Bullet             : .358, 180, Barnes 'TTSX' 30459
Useable Case Capaci: 61.627 grain H2O = 4.001 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : IMR 4064

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   98    52.83   2615    2733   42251   6324     90.9    1.177
-09.0  100    53.42   2643    2792   43548   6402     91.4    1.163
-08.0  101    54.00   2671    2851   44886   6480     91.9    1.149
-07.0  102    54.59   2699    2911   46269   6556     92.4    1.136
-06.0  103    55.18   2727    2972   47695   6631     92.8    1.122
-05.0  104    55.77   2755    3034   49166   6704     93.3    1.109
-04.0  105    56.35   2783    3096   50684   6775     93.7    1.096  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0  106    56.94   2811    3159   52251   6845     94.1    1.083  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0  107    57.53   2840    3223   53868   6913     94.5    1.070  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0  108    58.11   2868    3287   55539   6980     94.9    1.058  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  109    58.70   2896    3352   57271   7044     95.3    1.045  ! Near Maximum !
+01.0  110    59.29   2924    3418   59068   7107     95.7    1.033  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0  112    59.87   2953    3484   60932   7168     96.1    1.021  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0  113    60.46   2981    3551   62867   7226     96.4    1.009  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0  114    61.05   3009    3619   64876   7283     96.7    0.996  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0  115    61.64   3038    3688   66962   7337     97.0    0.985  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    109    58.70   3036    3683   67284   7080     99.2    0.985  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    109    58.70   2719    2955   47456   6709     88.2    1.134
 
I have tried the 200gr TTSX in the 35 Whelen / AI and it didn't do anything special for me as far as accuracy and I did see increased pressure.
I had better luck with the 200gr AB and 225gr PT and don't think you could go wrong using either of these 2 bullets unless you can only use mono bullets where you live.
Also if your rifle is a modern version you should be able to load to a little higher pressures and see an added advantage with it. Nosler list the 200gr AB loaded to 3000fps in their E-manual.
The 225gr PT at 2950fps is a sledge hammer.
 
Dr Mike,

can you explain why the TTSX must be loaded "lighter" than the original X? I thought the contact bands were to reduce bore contact and friction?

Jimbeaux
 
It is precisely because it has less bearing surface that it requires less propellant to drive it to what is essentially an identical velocity/(max chamber pressure). You could increase charge weight, but you will also increase pressure and gain a rather insignificant velocity boost.
 
Jim, I'm using the 180 TTSX in my 350 Rem Mag around 2850'ish I believe. It only has a 18" barrel but oh my darn is that bullet accurate in that rifle.

I think you'd have a real stomper in a Whelen.
 
I use the 200 grain TSX in my 350 RM. It leaves the muzzle at ~2750 fps with a stiff charge of TAC. Quite an accurate round.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Another 338/06 QL Request Please, 210 TTSX?
2
Replies
27
Views
1K
preacher
P
P
QL request 5.56 /accurate powders
Replies
0
Views
139
Polaris
P
HAWKEYESATX
35 Whelen 62k psi QL Data
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
Double Dropper
D
cloverleaf
6.5 Jap quick load-
Replies
10
Views
699
ShadeTree
S
Bonz
Bonz, 35 Whelen AI, been gone a while.
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Double Dropper
D
AMMUNITIONAmmunition BULLETSBullets BRASSBrass FirearmsFirearms GearGear
Back
Top