Anyone have load data for Partitions or Accubonds in 200g for 350 Rem Mag? The official load data doesn't include this bullet weight for the 350 Rem Mag. It's been around for a while anyone have an idea why they didn't include it ie is there a problem with Nosler bullets in this weight for the 350 Mag. Thx!
Load Data for 200g in .350 Rem Mag
- Thread starter Kjay
- Start date
DrMike
Ballistician
- Nov 8, 2006
- 36,902
- 5,063
Code:
Cartridge : .350 Rem. Mag.
Bullet : .358, 200, Nosler AccuBond 54425
Useable Case Capaci: 57.803 grain H2O = 3.753 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 61500 psi, or 424 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 112 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !
Powder type Filling/Loading Ratio Charge Charge Vel. Prop.Burnt P max P muzz B_Time
% Grains Gramm fps % psi psi ms
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Accurate 2495 108.1 56.3 3.65 2844 100.0 61500 7376 1.035 ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 2520 105.6 59.3 3.84 2837 99.5 61500 7631 1.018 ! Near Maximum !
Lovex D073.6 108.1 59.3 3.84 2837 99.5 61500 7631 1.018 ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H380 111.8 60.9 3.94 2814 95.0 61500 7929 1.016 ! Near Maximum !
Norma 203 old 112.0 60.3 3.91 2808 97.7 58196 7930 1.038 ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP3 112.0 60.3 3.91 2808 97.7 58196 7930 1.038 ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 4064 112.0 58.4 3.78 2790 99.7 56598 7637 1.068 ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 2460 100.4 57.6 3.73 2789 99.0 61500 7370 1.031 ! Near Maximum !
Lovex D073.5 100.7 57.6 3.73 2789 99.0 61500 7370 1.031 ! Near Maximum !
Rottweil R901 106.3 53.8 3.49 2785 99.7 61500 7289 1.039 ! Near Maximum !
Elcho 17 112.0 62.6 4.06 2781 95.5 53520 8437 1.053 ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-17 112.0 62.6 4.06 2781 95.5 53520 8437 1.053 ! Near Maximum !
SNPE Vectan SP 7 105.3 60.2 3.90 2779 94.8 61500 7605 1.023 ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 60 112.0 62.6 4.06 2767 96.1 52297 8563 1.063
Winchester 760 112.0 63.1 4.09 2752 89.9 55229 8045 1.049 ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H414 112.0 63.1 4.09 2752 89.9 55229 8045 1.049 ! Near Maximum !
IMR 4007 SSC 112.0 60.5 3.92 2735 90.6 60562 7522 1.033 ! Near Maximum !This particular bullet weight doesn't appear to provide optimal performance with many powders. I had good success with TAC and the 200 grain TSX in my own 350 RM. That could be an acceptable combination for you.
Code:
Cartridge : .350 Rem. Mag.
Bullet : .358, 200, Nosler AccuBond 54425
Useable Case Capaci: 57.803 grain H2O = 3.753 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder : Ramshot TAC
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-10.0 93 53.64 2483 2739 43634 6796 89.1 1.187
-09.0 94 54.24 2512 2802 45121 6886 89.7 1.169
-08.0 95 54.83 2540 2865 46664 6974 90.2 1.152
-07.0 96 55.43 2568 2929 48263 7061 90.7 1.135
-06.0 98 56.02 2597 2995 49923 7147 91.3 1.118
-05.0 99 56.62 2625 3061 51645 7231 91.8 1.101
-04.0 100 57.22 2654 3127 53432 7313 92.3 1.085 ! Near Maximum !
-03.0 101 57.81 2682 3195 55288 7394 92.7 1.069 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 102 58.41 2711 3264 57217 7473 93.2 1.053 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 103 59.00 2740 3333 59220 7549 93.7 1.037 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 104 59.60 2768 3403 61303 7624 94.1 1.022 ! Near Maximum !
+01.0 105 60.20 2797 3474 63469 7696 94.5 1.007 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 106 60.79 2826 3546 65723 7767 95.0 0.992 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 107 61.39 2855 3619 68068 7834 95.4 0.978 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 108 61.98 2884 3693 70511 7900 95.7 0.963 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 109 62.58 2912 3767 73057 7963 96.1 0.949 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 104 59.60 2907 3752 72571 7733 98.5 0.952 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 104 59.60 2594 2989 50533 7211 86.7 1.112
gerry
Ammo Smith
- Mar 1, 2007
- 6,677
- 1,227
Kjay":3do4fczb said:
Welcome to the forum, as a 35 caliber fan you will fit in nicely around here
There are a bunch of guys on here who shoot the 350 Rem Mag and can confirm but I though the AccuBond was too sleek to fit in a 2.8" magazine and not have the ogive down inside the case neck. I will concede I have never loaded a 350 RM round so will let those who do confirm that. I have loaded the Accubonds in 358 Norma in the past and currently in a 35 Whelen and 358 Win and both the 200 and 225 gr AB are some of the best bullets out there if you have the magazine length to load them.
- Thread starter
- #4
Thanks for taking the time to input the load table, all the great info and friendly welcome. I'm trying to stretch the range for an open country elk hunt this fall. I'm going to load both the 200g TTSX with Tac and compare it to the load I come up with for the 200g AccuBond. I want to reach 300-325 yards effectively. I usually use a 225g Partition but I want something that shoots flatter but still has the enough downrange energy. BTW to my surprise my 350 rem classic is significantly more accurate than my Browning 7mm-08. Not to knock the Browning, the Rem just performs that well.
