Search results

hi! my wife will hunt moose this fall, but she is very recoil sensitive. and she wants to use her own rifle a model 7 youth in 260 rem... with muzzle break!!! (to give an idea of how sensitive she is :wink: ) i have 4 boxes of factory remington 140 grain corelokt. but the of the 4 deer she shot...

savage 16 in 7mm wsm 150 gr scirocco at 3100 for deer and bear rem 700 lss in 300 ultra 200 accubond at 3000 for moose

For me it would be a 20 VarTarg It would be perfect for rockchuck hunting round here Where average shot is 100-150 Yard and it's low noise would be perfect Since neibors are close

last fall i swapped bullets with someone in another forum. ended up with 200 grains partition to use in my 300 ultra. i found time to load a few last weekend. since i use 92 gr of retumbo for my 200 accubond load and since i tried up to 95 gr without any pressure sign i tought it safe to load...

wonderful caliber! i've been looking to find one in left hand config. for years so i can have it AIed. with no luck finally settled on a 7mm wsm and i love it. but i would have liked the 280 AI better.

really interesting! we can see that speed or heavy weight does not always equal deeper penetration. the 150 scirocco i use in my 7 mm wsm did fairly well in the test.

i know it's an old post but i wanted to share the result of my shooting session of this afternoon. i didn't get the chance to work on my load this winter, but had time the last few weeks i followed Scotty's recommendation and bought a can of imr 7828. velocity is great. i chronoed between 3205...

i agree here too! of course we don't carry shooting bench in the field, and i won't be able to reproduce .50 to .75" moa groups from field position. but it can only be better than if the load is 2 moa from the bench to start with. i mean, for example my favorite 300 ultra load shoots .60"...

That's the reasons i started reloading for my 300 ultra, not much offers in factory ammo, and 75$ a box of 20. now that i'm reloading, i use the bullet i want, and a box of 20 will cost between 27 and 35 dollars depending on the bullet used.(premium bullets) i shoot about 200- 300 round a year...

can i expect the superformance to give good result in the 7mm wsm with 150 gr. bullets? not much load info yet with this stuff!

93.6 gr. reloader 25, cci 250 or WLRM primers ( same results) coal 3.650" (about mag lenght)

i would definately try different oal. my first try with the ttsx at 3.600" was giving me 1.5" groups. the exact same load at 3.650" gave me 0.5" i tried it many times with the same result. i also tried a 10 shot group for fun, 7 shots in .6" and the worst of the group enlarged it to 1.2" ( 9...

i know thw 168 ttsx is not the best weight bullet for the 300 rum but 93.6 gr of reloader 25 behind it turned 3 rem 700 into .50" shooter's for us velocity is not great at 3200 but accuracy is impressive to say the least worst groups with 1 of the 3 rifle was .60" best are a few groups in .25"...

retumbo and rl-25 works for mine here's 3 shot with 168 ttsx and rl25 0.241" (consistent .50" load but i prefer the terminal performance of the accubond) and five shots with 200 gr. accubond and retumbo

my first kill with the 7mm wsm, on the next to last evening of the season at home, leaving for Manitoba tomorrow :grin:

from what i read it should be awesome for 2 calibers i load for 260 rem and 7 wsm :twisted: i might start reloading for my 30-30 also,and give this leverevolution a try

thanks Beretz! :shock:

i see the same kind of pattern from my wife's 260 with the 120 gr. B/T i was out last saturday trying my 7 wsm at 350 and 450 yard to check my bdc reticle, and i brought along my wife's rifle for fun. the rifle was zeroed at 100 yard with factory ammo, and i was shooting reloads, that i knew...

i use them in my wife's 260. the 120 gr. kills deer on the spot and offer good penetration at the low velocity.( 2750 fps) internal damage is impressive. i switched to these after using the 140 corelokt and having problem with them ( under expension and pencil hole thru the vital)

isn't foam to soft? i'd be afraid that it would not give consistent result, the foam will flatten over time. but it's just a tought i didn't try it.