Dr. Vette
Handloader
- Apr 16, 2012
- 1,469
- 339
If you recall I did some initial development for charges about a month ago. I settled on the 68.5gr charge of 7828SSC for the test below.
The original thread is here:
http://forum.nosler.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27619
As a reference, the factory OAL is 3.142-5 or 3.160 depending which box I look at. Most were the shorter length. I use BTO (base to ogive) length, and I found that my loads in the first thread were 3.231 OAL or 2.718 BTO.
I made 3 loads each of 2.720, 2.690, 2.660 and 2.630 measuring the BTO on each, seating with a micrometer die so that each was exactly the same. Brass is from this rifle, trimmed, body die sized and then neck sized.
Data:
2.720 - 3387, 3385, 3407
2.690 - 3426, 3402, 3409
2.660 - 3406, 3419, 3420
2.630 - 3400, 3423, 3414*
*last shot had a slightly looser neck, which I noted immediately upon loading the round. This may have been a confounding error...
As you can see from the photos below, no true winner emerged.
The targets are top row 2.720/2.690/2.660 and the 2.630 was the middle of the bottom row. Groups are up and left compared to the bullseye, but I'm not worried about that. Targets were at 200 yards.
Up until my last shot of the 2.630 which was also the one with the looser neck I thought that round might be the one. However, I'm not so sure.
Any thoughts as to what I should do next?
Patrick
The original thread is here:
http://forum.nosler.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27619
As a reference, the factory OAL is 3.142-5 or 3.160 depending which box I look at. Most were the shorter length. I use BTO (base to ogive) length, and I found that my loads in the first thread were 3.231 OAL or 2.718 BTO.
I made 3 loads each of 2.720, 2.690, 2.660 and 2.630 measuring the BTO on each, seating with a micrometer die so that each was exactly the same. Brass is from this rifle, trimmed, body die sized and then neck sized.
Data:
2.720 - 3387, 3385, 3407
2.690 - 3426, 3402, 3409
2.660 - 3406, 3419, 3420
2.630 - 3400, 3423, 3414*
*last shot had a slightly looser neck, which I noted immediately upon loading the round. This may have been a confounding error...
As you can see from the photos below, no true winner emerged.
The targets are top row 2.720/2.690/2.660 and the 2.630 was the middle of the bottom row. Groups are up and left compared to the bullseye, but I'm not worried about that. Targets were at 200 yards.
Up until my last shot of the 2.630 which was also the one with the looser neck I thought that round might be the one. However, I'm not so sure.
Any thoughts as to what I should do next?
Patrick