the 270wsm/rl17 thread got me thinkin bout 325/rl17.
I'm pretty much settled on 66gr imr4350 for my 325, but was wondering what rl17 looks like from the quick load point of view? 200 gr PT - cci250 to be specific.
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 200, Nosler PART SP 35277
Useable Case Capaci: 72.066 grain H2O = 4.679 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-17
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 94 65.50 3027 4069 74931 9472 100.0 1.064 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 94 65.50 2794 3466 51897 10139 98.8 1.234
RL17 appears to work well with light for calibre in larger calibre cartridges. I would rather see the pressure curve extended over a larger area, but it isn't too bad. Here is the printout for IMR4350.
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 200, Nosler PART SP 35277
Useable Case Capaci: 72.066 grain H2O = 4.679 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : IMR 4350
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Generally, that is my observation. The data seems to bear this out, at least in part. For a Speer 150 grain SP, RL17 generates markedly more velocity, and may well be a better choice if it yields the accuracy you seek.
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 150, Speer SP 2277
Useable Case Capaci: 77.347 grain H2O = 5.022 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-17
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 98 73.00 3485 4046 73289 10260 100.0 0.942 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 98 73.00 3157 3320 50722 10612 95.7 1.103
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 150, Speer SP 2277
Useable Case Capaci: 77.347 grain H2O = 5.022 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : IMR 4350
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 106 75.00 3428 3914 73398 10322 99.8 0.952 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 106 75.00 3076 3151 51021 9930 90.3 1.115
With a heavier bullet, such as a 220 grain Swift A-Frame, the differential is not so great. While RL17 may still be the choice, you really can't make that decision on velocity alone with such a small differential.
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 220, Swift A-Frame SS
Useable Case Capaci: 70.306 grain H2O = 4.565 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : IMR 4350
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 99 64.00 2826 3902 73352 9130 100.0 1.136 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 99 64.00 2591 3279 52607 9400 95.6 1.310
Cartridge : .325 WSM
Bullet : .323, 220, Swift A-Frame SS
Useable Case Capaci: 70.306 grain H2O = 4.565 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.860 inch = 72.64 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-17
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
I just did a recalculation, and based on the 220 grain Swift, I'd likely look at RL19 over RL17 based on minor velocity increase but significantly improved case fill. I like Ramshot Hunter, MagPro and N550 even better with these heavier bullets. Reviewing my own loads, I see that I lean more heavily to RL19 than any other powder. H100V, IMR 4007 SSC and H4350 are used somewhat less, but still much more than other powders.
Man, that 220gr Swift has to be a hammer in the 8mm! Excellent SD and pretty good speeds too. That 325 is very interesting. Kind of the quiet WSM! Scotty
I do love my 325 WSM. Loaded with 200 grain PTs at 2800 fps, it is a hammer on moose and elk. With the 220 grain A-Frames at 2700 fps +, it hits hard and drops game with authority.