wisconsinteacher
Handloader
- Dec 2, 2010
- 1,980
- 293
When developing loads, can one intermix the AB and the BT if they are the same weight? I have both but want to keep the AB for hunting. Will this work or not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
DrMike":16717dfz said:Minute differences in bearing surfaces, jacket thickness, core composition, etc., can introduce significant disparity in results.
bullet":2zgc4w65 said:Dr Mike":2zgc4w65 said:Minute differences in bearing surfaces, jacket thickness, core composition, etc., can introduce significant disparity in results.
:roll:
that a critter will not be able to tell....
With my .270 using 140 AB or BT,s both hit the same place on the target at 100 hundred yards using the same load for each. In fact my 150 BT,s are right there as well. :wink: :wink:wisconsinteacher":3p3ia4wt said:When developing loads, can one intermix the AB and the BT if they are the same weight? I have both but want to keep the AB for hunting. Will this work or not?
257 Ackley":2iozyvx1 said:bullet":2iozyvx1 said:Dr Mike":2iozyvx1 said:Minute differences in bearing surfaces, jacket thickness, core composition, etc., can introduce significant disparity in results.
:roll:
that a critter will not be able to tell....
The game may not be able to tell the difference, but the rifle you are shooting may tell you something completely different. Different bullets, you can never assume..
HeathSexton":249k47r4 said:If I am going to take the time to work up loads and put in the time to get after critters I am going to make sure that I am hitting a little better than a 9" kill area. I do not hunt with magnums but I want every ounce of performance accuracy wise from my rifles.
I have a friends 7RM here right now, he figures a 9" kill zone is plenty big enough to not really worry with accuracy. So far in 3 years he has killed 1 deer and wounded 8 more, great track record he has.
tpbscha":37px2xpv said:I think the issue here is that anytime you change any component in reloading, it is safe practice to back the load off just a bit and work back up. Changing bullets in a load that may be at the threshhold of maximum safe pressures could be the defining factor that causes a pierced primer. By all means, if the two bullets shoot close enough for the OP (which should be achievable) then it's a fine idea. Safety first!
HeathSexton":11u5amoa said:The Nosler book max for H414 and the 55gr NBT in .243 Win will blow primers and you have to take a hammer to the bolt on my friend's .243. He thought since it was in the book it was ok.
Starting at max is never a good idea.
tpbscha":148gsj9g said:I think the issue here is that anytime you change any component in reloading, it is safe practice to back the load off just a bit and work back up. Changing bullets in a load that may be at the threshhold of maximum safe pressures could be the defining factor that causes a pierced primer. By all means, if the two bullets shoot close enough for the OP (which should be achievable) then it's a fine idea. Safety first!
beretzs":13br30yx said:tpbscha":13br30yx said:I think the issue here is that anytime you change any component in reloading, it is safe practice to back the load off just a bit and work back up. Changing bullets in a load that may be at the threshhold of maximum safe pressures could be the defining factor that causes a pierced primer. By all means, if the two bullets shoot close enough for the OP (which should be achievable) then it's a fine idea. Safety first!
Couldn't have said it better myself. No harm in being safe and controlling risk as best as possible.
Boolit, every rifle is different. A slighty tighter or looser cut chamber will raise or lower pressures quite a bit. That is why they have min and max loads. Scotty
A slighty tighter or looser cut chamber