Pronghorn/Mule Deer rifle

Yeah, I have to agree, regarding large case capacity contributing to barrels losing accuracy quickly, especially when fired hot. About 10 years ago, I was convinced that I needed a big Magnum cartridge for elk hunting. Over time, I learned that 30-06 was more than enough for elk, but I got gun rag reading crazy and bought a Browning rifle in 300RUM.
I was already running my 30-06 pretty hot using 180gr. bullets and expected to get a lot more muzzle velocity, which should translate in flatter trajectory, from the new 300RUM. I found out quickly that the 300RUM was very finicky in terms of what propellant and bullet it liked. I worked my way through a number of bullet/propellant combinations, until I was getting good accuracy. I then began to work upwards to attain the speed that I thought that I wanted. The accuracy matched my old 30-06, which was very acceptable, UNTIL I went into higher MV. As soon as I was getting 50fps over what my 30-06 was providing, the groups opened up! I tried mightily, not wanting to give up. My log book showed over 900 rounds fired through the 300RUM bore. On each outing to the range, I took a number of rifles, so that I could allow the RUM to cool for an honest 20 minutes between firing. As you may guess, I was burning lots more propellant than in the 30-06 and the gains were minimal. Reports, that I read, claimed a loss of accuracy in many 300RUM rifles after 1200 rounds fired! I was rapidly approaching that limit, when I gave up and sold the rifle, dies and cases. It was an interesting experiment. Your mileage may vary. I am not knocking the 300RUM, but only reporting on my own, first hand experience.
Given today's premium bullet performance, no elk can stand against a good shot, launching a 165gr. bullet. That said, why the craze for Magnum cartridges?
My 7mmRemMag was a marvelous game getter for many years, but I sold it and got a rifle chambered in 280Rem. Reasons; less recoil, less propellant used and a lighter hunting rifle, with very little lost in effective range. I will say that I put thousands of rounds through the 7mmRemMag bore and never saw a loss of accuracy, but again, I never did shoot it hot and always laid it down and fired other rifles, in order to allow the thin sporting barrel to cool.
Best,
Steven in DeLand, FL
 
"I hope you get drawn too."

When I did my antelope hunt in 2009, I took my Winchester M70XTR in .270 Win. shooting the 150 gr. Sierra game King at a bit over 2900 FPS. My back up rifle was a Winchester M70 Featherweight in 7x57. A rather short sneak and a shot at about 75 yards put my goat on the ground. The ironoc part is I could have just as easily taken tht one with my old 1911 M94 30-30 shooting my pet cast bullet load. Still, after not drawing for antelope in my home state for over 33 years now, I went out of state, paid some coin and finally did a hunt for one. Right now I'm saving my pennies for another one but I still think I'll take the .270 as back up this time and my as of yet unbloodied custom .280 Remington as primary.
Paul B.
 
PJGunner":4m5ao9wt said:
"I hope you get drawn too."

When I did my antelope hunt in 2009, I took my Winchester M70XTR in .270 Win. shooting the 150 gr. Sierra game King at a bit over 2900 FPS. My back up rifle was a Winchester M70 Featherweight in 7x57. A rather short sneak and a shot at about 75 yards put my goat on the ground. The ironoc part is I could have just as easily taken tht one with my old 1911 M94 30-30 shooting my pet cast bullet load. Still, after not drawing for antelope in my home state for over 33 years now, I went out of state, paid some coin and finally did a hunt for one. Right now I'm saving my pennies for another one but I still think I'll take the .270 as back up this time and my as of yet unbloodied custom .280 Remington as primary.
Paul B.

Paul, I imagine either your 270 or 280 would be some great prong buck rifles. I have always wanted to take an antelope with my 270WSM and the 150gr BT's. They would be dynamite I think. Scotty
 
PJ Hunter did write: ".....270 as back up this time and my as of yet unbloodied custom .280 Remington as primary...."

As you wrote, there was some irony in the fact that you took your antelope at well within 30-30 range. However, as you know, out there, there are no guarantees when you will get another shot at a pronghorn buck at that short range. I like the other three calibers that you mentioned owning and would not hesitate to take any one of them. .270Win., 7x57Mauser and 280Rem. While I am now carrying a .280Rem. as my primary game getter, for years I held off getting a rifle in .280Rem., simply because I owned and used a .270Win. and ballistically the two are so close that owning both made little sense to me. Even Jack O'Connor, who years ago promoted the .270Win. for worldwide hunting, said late in life that were he starting over, he'd go with the .280Rem. Respecting what old Jack knew of rifles and cartridges, my guess is that in all around shooting/hunting, the .280Rem. does edge out the .270Win. That is not to cut down the .270Win. as I believe that in most all practical hunting experiences, one could gather the same amount of game, using either.
Steven in DeLand, FL
 
Back
Top