Which would you choose?

[Wolfshead]

AccuBond!

 

[GregoryB.]

I agree with WVBuckBuster on the NBT. 98% of my loads are with this bullet in a multitude of calibers. Always find a load that shoots well with minimal effort.

 

[grry10]

There are so many good bullets being produced today that seems that it seems to me it is just a point of personal preference.

 

[Chuck R]

There are so many good bullets being produced today that seems that it seems to me it is just a point of personal preference.

I agree. In the "premium" bullet lineup I've used PTs, NABs and ABLRs, TTX and TTSX.

All have worked as advertised.

 

[PJGunner]

AccuBond. That is if the rifle likes it.
Paul B.

 

[diverdown]

AccuBond. That is if the rifle likes it.
Paul B.

Thank you for posting that comment. I tried Accubonds in my .338RUM and could not get them to shoot to the accuracy level I was looking for. The Partition on the other hand did an excellent job both in the accuracy Department and the Elk Department.

 

[FOTIS]

Bullet all the way.

TTSX, LRX, Hammers (tipped hammer if possible) and ..unfortunately now defunct...GS Custom.

Accubonds also make the list (NOT ABLR's)

 

[PJGunner]

Bullet all the way.

TTSX, LRX, Hammers (tipped hammer if possible) and ..unfortunately now defunct...GS Custom.

Accubonds also make the list (NOT ABLR's)

I tried the 150 gr. ABLRs in three 7x57 rifls and a .280 Remington. None of the rifles liked that bullet. Too bad. It's a really good looking bullet.
Paul B.