- Oct 30, 2004
- 24,502
- 3,689
Seems to me it would be the perfect platform no?
Lots of power in a short rifle.
Lots of power in a short rifle.
Why no RUMS in the Ruger #1?
- Thread starter FOTIS
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #3
- Oct 30, 2004
- 24,502
- 3,689
Exactly ! You can go with a 29" tube and still be withing sendero length
Guy Miner
Master Loader
- Apr 6, 2006
- 17,895
- 6,657
Have you taken a look at Ruger's greatly diminished lineup of Number One rifles?
Very few cartridges being offered. They've also said they're only going to be offering 5 cartridges per year for a while. If I read that correctly. I suspect they're mostly going to be offering various "classic" cartridges in the Number One.
But... your thought makes sense, and I think it would be simple for a good gunsmith to turn a Number One into a .300 Rem Ultra Mag. Heck, almost every other cartridge has been done on that excellent falling block action!
Guy
Very few cartridges being offered. They've also said they're only going to be offering 5 cartridges per year for a while. If I read that correctly. I suspect they're mostly going to be offering various "classic" cartridges in the Number One.
But... your thought makes sense, and I think it would be simple for a good gunsmith to turn a Number One into a .300 Rem Ultra Mag. Heck, almost every other cartridge has been done on that excellent falling block action!
Guy
- Nov 4, 2004
- 25,675
- 10,017
I too am surprised that the No 1 is not offered in the RUMs.
JD338
JD338
