nomosendero
Handloader
- Apr 13, 2006
- 536
- 1
I read an article in May/June Sports Afield: Choosing a better game bullet.
Barness wrote the article & as a side note stated that alot of Elk hunters
have been asking for a "tougher" 180 BT & that the 180 now has a much thicker jacket, in fact he says the new jacket is 60% of the bullet wt.
1. Nosler, is this true.
2. If so, will it be longer now (seems it would be) & shaped more like the AccuBond.
3. Would the BC change, I know the AccuBond was rated the same as a BT
in the 180, even though the Acc. was longer & some claim it dropped less ?
4.Would it be more likely than before to have the same POI as an AccuBond. If so, it would make me & others more likely to use both, I would still prefer bonded on Elk & bigger, but would like to see a tough BT.
5. I have noticed the box has changed for the BT, did this happen the same time the bullet changed, if not is there a lot # to look for.
My 300 Sendero wants to know
Thanks
Barness wrote the article & as a side note stated that alot of Elk hunters
have been asking for a "tougher" 180 BT & that the 180 now has a much thicker jacket, in fact he says the new jacket is 60% of the bullet wt.
1. Nosler, is this true.
2. If so, will it be longer now (seems it would be) & shaped more like the AccuBond.
3. Would the BC change, I know the AccuBond was rated the same as a BT
in the 180, even though the Acc. was longer & some claim it dropped less ?
4.Would it be more likely than before to have the same POI as an AccuBond. If so, it would make me & others more likely to use both, I would still prefer bonded on Elk & bigger, but would like to see a tough BT.
5. I have noticed the box has changed for the BT, did this happen the same time the bullet changed, if not is there a lot # to look for.
My 300 Sendero wants to know
Thanks