Those are all good rounds.
I can't from any logical perspective tell you one is any better than another, buy I really like the Roberts.
I have 2 rifles so chamberd and a ackley improved roberts too.
There is no question that the .260 will handle bigger game like elk better than the Roberts, and I am sure the .260 is no big kicker either.
But The Ruger hawkey featherweight in .257 roberts would be a danday rifle for any thing under about 500, lbs.
Often extreemly acurate.
It performes well from shorter barreld rifles. My Ruger ultra light will put 3, 100 grain tripple shocks into well under an inch and gets 3140 from a 20 inch tube.
With a 270 in your safe , I think a 25,06 is awfully close to the same thing.
But that is just my predjuduce. The other rounds are great too.
...tj3006
I can't from any logical perspective tell you one is any better than another, buy I really like the Roberts.
I have 2 rifles so chamberd and a ackley improved roberts too.
There is no question that the .260 will handle bigger game like elk better than the Roberts, and I am sure the .260 is no big kicker either.
But The Ruger hawkey featherweight in .257 roberts would be a danday rifle for any thing under about 500, lbs.
Often extreemly acurate.
It performes well from shorter barreld rifles. My Ruger ultra light will put 3, 100 grain tripple shocks into well under an inch and gets 3140 from a 20 inch tube.
With a 270 in your safe , I think a 25,06 is awfully close to the same thing.
But that is just my predjuduce. The other rounds are great too.
...tj3006