Guy Miner
Master Loader
- Apr 6, 2006
- 17,848
- 6,364
I apologize up front for not having any Nosler bullets to test. Here's the numbers and photos for the 350 grain Swift A-Frame and the 350 grain Hornady:
Hornady, 350 FNSP, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer = 2086 fps mv
Recovered in 6th water jug, .846" dia, 296 grains retained
Swift A-Frame, 350 gr, same load = 2046 fps
Recovered in 7th water jug, .710" dia, 345 grains retained , picture perfect mushroom. Photos show the Swift on the left and the Hornady on the right.
Rifle was my 22" barreled Marlin 1895, range was 20 yards. Ten, one-gallon milk jugs, filled with water were lined up. Easily repeatable test and I have several other 300, 350 and 400+ grain bullets to test. I was very impressed with the results from each bullet. The Swift is expensive, but apparently worthwhile if going after bigger game. I was a bit surprised that it didn't penetrate a lot farther than the Hornady.
Regards, Guy
Hornady, 350 FNSP, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer = 2086 fps mv
Recovered in 6th water jug, .846" dia, 296 grains retained
Swift A-Frame, 350 gr, same load = 2046 fps
Recovered in 7th water jug, .710" dia, 345 grains retained , picture perfect mushroom. Photos show the Swift on the left and the Hornady on the right.
Rifle was my 22" barreled Marlin 1895, range was 20 yards. Ten, one-gallon milk jugs, filled with water were lined up. Easily repeatable test and I have several other 300, 350 and 400+ grain bullets to test. I was very impressed with the results from each bullet. The Swift is expensive, but apparently worthwhile if going after bigger game. I was a bit surprised that it didn't penetrate a lot farther than the Hornady.
Regards, Guy