7mm Rem Mag Loads: why you can't always listen to friends

Mountain Goat

Handloader
Dec 14, 2010
386
12
I've been playing with a friend's new XCR II in 7 Rem Mag after he asked me if I would get some loads worked up for him. He conslulted his uncle who loads for the 7 mag and has handloaded for decades, and also shoots the 140gr TTSX which my friend wants to shoot in his rifle, too.

His uncle recommended H-1000. I wanted to try a few powders that I have on the shelf, this helps get the feel of a new rifle and what it will do without the need of a new powder purchase right off the get go. Anyway, after looking at several load manuals and online resources, it looked like 72-73gr was a target maximum load. After 3 range sessions trying various charges and seating depths, 71.5gr was showing consistent 1" and smaller groups, many with two in one hole. 72.5gr was the next best, but I felt it was a little hot. There were no signs. It was just a hunch.

After narrowing down the seating depth, we wanted to run a series of loads over the chrono to confirm further consistency. I know speed isn't everything, but if one is shooting a 140gr bullet out of a 7 mag, why settle for 2950 fps, right?

The first 3 at 71.5gr were just over 3000 with 3021 being the fastest.
The first one at 72.5gr clocked 3236! Yes, the barrel was cool.
I did not like this, but shot another through just to be sure. Yikes, 3252. I read this as a huge pressure spike that is too much velocity gain for just one more grain of powder. I recommended that we stop and note the 71.5gr load as a fall-back if nothing else works in future load development. My friend agreed, but was not satisfied with 3000fps. I agreed. My 280 Rem shoots the 140 TSX at 2930 out of a 22" barrel.

He called his uncle right then and asked again exactly what his load was that was used by him, his son and his hunting buddy. Three guys use the same handload in 3 different rifles. Here's the scary part. His uncle said the load was 75.5gr of H-1000! They shoot 73.5gr with the 160gr AccuBond! This is the reference to my thread title why you can't always trust friend's load data, or anyone's for that matter. It worries me a little that I was elk hunting with a guy that was packing 75.5gr loads. Had that gun blown up on opening morning when he pulled the trigger on his bull, he might still be in the bottom of that canyon, my hunting partner, not the elk. We packed the elk out.

Since I was not real confident in H-1000 in the 7 mag with 140gr bullets, I decided to step out on my own with some IMR7828 since I had it on hand. Each charge was showing promise and groups were getting tighter as I reached loads that were 1 grain below published max. My friend agreed that these were worth revisiting, but he wanted to see some chrony numbers first. So, I took the last 6 that were loaded at 68.0gr and ran them over the chrono. We both smiled as the 6 shots averaged 3149 with a S.D. of just 17. I plan on working up to 69.0gr and feel I can safely reach 3220. Hopefully accuracy will stay. I'm not one to chase the last 80fps, but as I stated earlier, why shoot a 7 mag at 3000fps if you don't have to? The cartridge has much more to offer.

I just wanted to share with everyone that there are shooters out there that are not practicing what I consider safe handloading. In this case, it was a very close friend's uncle. This should also serve as a reminder to everyone that just because someone else is or says they are shooting xxx grains of powder or are getting xxxx fps, doesn't mean that it is true or safe or that you should attempt to accomplish the same.

When my friend asked if he should get some of those loads and try them, I said, "Hell no!"
 
The safe approach is always the best.
With the right load, you should be able to get 3200 fps. Another powder to look at is RL 22.

JD338
 
Some of us older cranks tend to get lazy (sloppy). When that happens, bad things result. Good for you to pull back on the reins. I emphasise restraint and caution in each hand loading class I present. To borrow the old saw, "There are old handloaders, and there are bold handloaders; but there are no old, bold handloaders."
 
RL 22 is great in the 7mm mag. Rem factory loads use 7828 at least in the 150 gr weight BT and they clock at 3150 fps.
My h1000 load was 72.5 gr with the 162 Hornady BT. That one produced 3100 fps.
 
Good lessons in handloading. Thanks for posting that. The 7mm mag continues to impress me, after all these years. Several years ago I ran some factory ammo over the chronograph, from a 24" Remington 700:

Remington 140's ran as hard as 3225 fps

Federal 160's approached within a whisker of 3100 fps

Those are pretty decent numbers, that I'm happy to equal with my own handloads.

Regards, Guy
 
Of all the cartridges I've loaded for (a big list, but not huge), I've found the most variability in 7mmRemMag data, chamberings, and performance. I loaded for one a while back and found it to have a "visibly" long shoulder measurement (literally over .040" longer than new or FL sized brass). That rifle had dismal velocities compared to manuals and to four other 7mmRemMags belonging to friends/acquaintances, using the same loads. Variation among the five rifles was extremely large, as well - close to 350fps for identical loads. I was able to safely work up above charge levels used in a couple of these other rifles, and yet never achieved the velocities the other rifles achieved at lower charges. I'm convinced that this chambering is highly variable in shoulder length, and as such, what might be completely unsafe in a number of rifles, may in fact be perfectly safe in any number of others in this chambering.

The lesson is still intact, though, that you can only safely handload if you always follow the correct workup procedures and start low every time.
 
dubyam":2vmm3xmx said:
Of all the cartridges I've loaded for (a big list, but not huge), I've found the most variability in 7mmRemMag data, chamberings, and performance. I loaded for one a while back and found it to have a "visibly" long shoulder measurement (literally over .040" longer than new or FL sized brass). That rifle had dismal velocities compared to manuals and to four other 7mmRemMags belonging to friends/acquaintances, using the same loads. Variation among the five rifles was extremely large, as well - close to 350fps for identical loads. I was able to safely work up above charge levels used in a couple of these other rifles, and yet never achieved the velocities the other rifles achieved at lower charges. I'm convinced that this chambering is highly variable in shoulder length, and as such, what might be completely unsafe in a number of rifles, may in fact be perfectly safe in any number of others in this chambering.

The lesson is still intact, though, that you can only safely handload if you always follow the correct workup procedures and start low every time.

I worked on a 7 RM using 160ABs last fall with the same dismal velocity issues. 64.5gn of RL-22 was only producing about 2830fps. I slowly worked up to 66gns of RL-22 to achieve 2950fps w/no pressure signs. I think I went up to 66.5 or 67gns( can't remember) but the groups opened up and decided testing was done asI had gone through about 60 bullets to develope a load for this rifle. The young man is still shooting the 64.5gn loads I gave him for his B-day. I gave him the choice of which load to use, 64.5 or 66. The 66 had just a slightly smaller group size. The 64.5 loads produced around a .92???" 3-shot group size and the 66gn loads produced around .89???" 3 shot group size - all at 100yds.

So with all this, it's possible those loads from your friend's Uncle may very well be safe in THOSE rifles. I can't say they are safe or unsafe because I didn't do the developement work for them. FYI, I was 3-4gns over Nosler's listed max of 63gn for this rifle using RL-22 and 160AB.
 
Agree that there does seem to be considerable variation in the chambers and throats of various 7mm RM rifles.

Some years ago, Sierra recommended I try 65 gr of RL-22 with their 160's - working up to it of course. The results were so good, that I have worked to about that load in several different 7mm RM's with both Sierra & Nosler 160's. Usually develops about 3,000 fps, more or less. It's listed as a max load by Sierra, or was at the time. I haven't checked newer data. Personally I have no problem going a little beyond that load in some rifles, working up carefully of course.

Guy
 
JD338":c7i5c9sg said:
The safe approach is always the best.
With the right load, you should be able to get 3200 fps. Another powder to look at is RL 22.

JD338

RL-22 would be my first choice in powder, but wanted to use what I had on hand first to get a "feel" for the rifle. The next session we will certainly put the IMR7828 loads up against a series of RL-22 loads. My friend is waiting for his new B&C stock to arrive first. That XCR II will look awesome in a tan/black web stock.

Those loads might be safe in another rifle, but safe in 3 other rifles? I think not. Those guys are what I call "speed freaks."
 
They may well be speed freaks, MG. Then again, they may all have rifles with very long shoulders and throats, and the ability to push those loads safely. I'm inclined to call BS unless and until I saw the load workup, though, too. This particular chambering is one of those anomalies in the standardization world of gun manufacture. I've not worked with the 300WinMag, so perhaps it, too, is highly variable. But I've not heard that from others, like I've heard it about the 7mmRemMag. It's almost like there's just a wide variety of very similar wildcats all built off the same parent case and within a fairly narrow range of dimensions, but they all act a little different, for sure!

Kudos to you for being smart and safe. Keep up the good work.
 
In a couple of rifles, we are 4-5 grains over max listed loads, and that is just to get us close to expected velocites. Since we know WHY this should be expected in these rifles, we are comfortable with the loads. Just don't expect me to be posting those loads here, or share them with fiends without ample disclosures.
 
If the chamber for a rifle is cut generously, allowing the case to expand to greater capacity than SAAMI specs, it will require more powder to generate a given pressure. Similarly, if a chamber is cut tight, the pressure will be reached with smaller amounts of powder. Since there is a range of permissible chamber measurements, no one can predict what powder charge will generate maximum chamber pressure for a given rifle. For this reason, the cardinal commandment for all hand loaders is to work up each load from a safe minimum on an unknown rifle, or when changing any component.

Like others, I have rifles that require what superficially appears to be excess charges to obtain anticipated pressures. By the same token, I have rifles that reach their potential at charges considerable below the maximum charge. It would be a grave mistake to assume that loads in these rifles are interchangeable. As an aside, somewhat germane to this discussion, I have shot several rifles with factory ammunition that exhibited severe pressure spikes. The chambers were tight and the factory ammunition was tickling the dragon's tail. It can make for an exciting day at the bench on occasion.

QuickLOAD projects that the charges of H1000 with a 140 grain TTSX that Mountain Goat's friend suggested are over by at least two grains. Perhaps the chamber on one of the rifles is larger than standardised specs, but it is unlikely that all three rifles in question are cut identically. Assuming a standardised chamber, the charge is generating a pressure that is several thousand psi over SAAMI Pmax. While the brass and the chamber will undoubtedly will tolerate this pressure, it will ensure shorter life for the brass and risk weakening the chamber metal in time. SAAMI pressures for the 7mm RM is 61,000 psi; CIP allows 62,000 psi. The load projects over 68,000 psi. The load suggested with a 160 grain AB appears to generate in excess of 69,000 psi. I have no doubt that they are getting 3100 + fps from that load. MG is correct to avoid chasing the last 80 fps. Such an effort is foolhardy at best and suicidal in some instances.
 
The velocity reading over 3200fps didn't worry as much as the fact that it jumped over 200fps with just one additional grain of powder. That was the red flag for me, and is an example of how handloading without a chronograph can be somewhat loading blind.

Factory Federal Fusion ammo in this rifle shows some signs of heavy bolt lift. We didn't try any Winchester Supreme Ballistic Silver Tips since that stuff is known to run hot in many cartridges.

I measured the shoulders of new cases and once-fired cased and found nothing unusual. I think all the bottle neck belted cases have shoulder length issues of some sort. I guess we can blame that on the American ego of the "belted magnum." Damn you H&H!

I fully expect to reach 3200fps with IMR7828 and/or RL-22 and still have good accuracy and consistency. The 400yd gong is in trouble, again.
 
I have a slew of both belted and non belted cartridges, I like them all! I think that if you adjust your dies for your rifle properly it really doesn't matter. I have an old 7mm Mag that is really long on the shoulder length, it also shoots 175 grain bullets at 2960 safely. I really think the gun manufacturers need something to sell new guns and this is what they are pushing! If you have one of them damn 300 H&H's laying around and don't want it-- I'll gladly take it! :grin:
 
I have been using H 1000 with 160 ABs in my 7mm rem mag for several years now. I have found that the powder is not real consistent lot to lot. First lot gave around 3080 fps with 72 grs the second took 74 for that velocity. My current and third lot uses 73 to get the same velocity. (chronographed) Luckily though, I have three shot one hole groups from every lot. Using a powder that varies considerably from lot to lot and throw in a variety of firearms to compare and your surely gonna get, "don't trust other peoples loads".
 
I had some decent luck with the 160's and RL22 and IMR7828. Both of those will get tried again. I know the RL22 and 160gr bullets are excellent in my M70. Scotty
 
I've recently used a fair amount of H1000 as a number of people ask that I duplicate the loads for HSM ammunition with Berger bullets. I've had no particular problems with H1000. It is a good powder, but I do prefer other powders in my own 7mm RM.
 
Lyman #49 lists the 140gr nosler ballistic tip with H1000 as the most consistant accuracy. starting load of 66gr and a max load of 72.7gr compressed 3139fps, 60,600psi. rem 9 1/2m primers, rem cases, OAL 3.290. 24" barrel in universal reciever. Working up to 73gr of H1000 with some bullets seems very possible to me, Completely within safe operating pressures. An all copper bullet choice is where the problem starts. Too long, too much powder compression, too much bearing surface. 73gr might be over 70,000psi with an all copper 140gr bullet in a particular rifle. it might be 50,000 with a 140gr flat base cup/core bullet.
 
Great feedback thus far with some very credible testimony. The Barnes manual shows 72.0gr of H-1000 as the max for the 140gr TTSX, and I think that's spot on with this rifle. That load did not shoot well, though. Regardless of chamber differences or lot-to-lot variation of powder, I will not be looking at the 75 grain loads, never even considered them.

I'm going to give it a workout with the IMR7828 loads this weekend, hopefully. RL-22 is next.
 
Back
Top