bullet
Handloader
- Dec 26, 2007
- 4,973
- 8
I reached up to a shelf above my desk to retrieve my digital scale. In bringing it down to my desk it slipped out of my hand and fell about 10" as I quickly tried to grab it to lessen it's fall. It did not seem like a hard hit at all as I was able to buffer its impact, at least I assumed this. Well, got to dump my digital scale. I noticed last night when I calibrated it and then put my powder dish on the scale to zero it out so I could weigh powder, the numbers were less by 9/10 of a grain than they have been since using this digital scale.
So, I pulled out my Redding Model #1 mechanical scale, set it all up and adjusted the scale to zero. Then I set my scale to the needed grains and took one of the cases I had just loaded on the digital scale in question. I poured it out in my scale dish and made sure every piece of powder was out of the case and in the dish. It took 9/10 of a grain more powder using the mechanical scale to equal the needed grains for this load.
Now that really concerned me so I took some loads I put together the day before when the digital scale was working like it always has and pulled the bullet and then weighed it on the Model #1 Redding and it was 54grs on the nose. So, ditch one digital scale and back to my Model #1 mechanical scale for now. Sure liked the digital scale, I was able to load three times faster with it than with my mechanical scale. I have re-calibrated the scale a number of times to see if it would begin to work correctly, but no luck.
Since I was comparing Accurate 2495BR against H4895 in my 30-06 load using the 150gr HV, the AA2495BR would surely have looked anemic compared against the velocities of H4895. Had I used the digital scale not paying attention to the weight numbers of my dish when setting it to zero I would have wondered why such a difference in velocities. Of course this would have been even worse if the scale was 9/10 of a grain more considering the fact that I was working close to a max load after having worked up to this charge.
I have from time to time used my mechanical scale to double check my digital scale and it was always on the money, but since the numbers were different this time after calibrating it, I surely had to check it out. Glad I did! I don't have to tell you guys that one always needs to be cautious and disciplined when it comes to reloading, but only reminding those who are just now starting to reload. It is possible though, because of familiarity, that even and experienced reloader can over look something. It only takes one mistake for things to go bad. I always double and sometimes triple check my procedures when reloading. Anyway just a little experience I had reloading last night.
Will test the AA2495BR Monday or Tuesday of next week. :mrgreen:
So, I pulled out my Redding Model #1 mechanical scale, set it all up and adjusted the scale to zero. Then I set my scale to the needed grains and took one of the cases I had just loaded on the digital scale in question. I poured it out in my scale dish and made sure every piece of powder was out of the case and in the dish. It took 9/10 of a grain more powder using the mechanical scale to equal the needed grains for this load.
Now that really concerned me so I took some loads I put together the day before when the digital scale was working like it always has and pulled the bullet and then weighed it on the Model #1 Redding and it was 54grs on the nose. So, ditch one digital scale and back to my Model #1 mechanical scale for now. Sure liked the digital scale, I was able to load three times faster with it than with my mechanical scale. I have re-calibrated the scale a number of times to see if it would begin to work correctly, but no luck.
Since I was comparing Accurate 2495BR against H4895 in my 30-06 load using the 150gr HV, the AA2495BR would surely have looked anemic compared against the velocities of H4895. Had I used the digital scale not paying attention to the weight numbers of my dish when setting it to zero I would have wondered why such a difference in velocities. Of course this would have been even worse if the scale was 9/10 of a grain more considering the fact that I was working close to a max load after having worked up to this charge.
I have from time to time used my mechanical scale to double check my digital scale and it was always on the money, but since the numbers were different this time after calibrating it, I surely had to check it out. Glad I did! I don't have to tell you guys that one always needs to be cautious and disciplined when it comes to reloading, but only reminding those who are just now starting to reload. It is possible though, because of familiarity, that even and experienced reloader can over look something. It only takes one mistake for things to go bad. I always double and sometimes triple check my procedures when reloading. Anyway just a little experience I had reloading last night.
Will test the AA2495BR Monday or Tuesday of next week. :mrgreen: