I finally invested in QuickLoad and have been playing with it way too much. I have figured out how to edit the powder lists, bullet lists, and cartridge lists so far. I have also figured out how to adjust weighting factor, powder Ba to help match predictions to actual findings. Working on figuring out different firearm setups.
First question. I want to set up a wildcat cartridge that is not included in the cartridge list. I don't have QuickDesign to draw it up and transfer it. What I am looking for is a 7-300 win mag. What I did was copy the 300 win mag data line
.300 Win. Mag.(W) ","93.8","2.62",".308",".5","47.32","430","Piezo CIP","3.34","","","","","","","","","","","","300WINMA.jpg"
and then modified it to my predicted 7-300 win mag case
"7 mm-300 Win. Mag.(W) ","91.8","2.62",".284",".55","40.39","460","Piezo CIP","3.605","","","","","","","","","","","","300WINMA.jpg"
and added it to my "caliber" list. It seems to work quite well. Is this valid enough to estimate the performance of the case? Or would I need to find a better way or beg for someone to develop a file through QuickDesign?
Second question. I have read about most powders being fairly close to the real world, but a few aren't. The one I see referenced regularly is Varget. My question is this... My "wildcat cartridge" seems fairly consistent with other people's load data when evaluating H1000, but not as close when evaluating Retumbo. Many Retumbo loads run by other reloaders are 4 grains less than what QL predicts. Anything funny with Retumbo in QL? Or do I just need to be patient and establish a baseline lower charge with muzzle velocity and then start adjusting QL?
Third question. Anyone have any neat tricks or shortcuts for the novice user? I seem to be struggling a bit on data management, ie. saving loads and organizing how I use the program.
Thanks in advance
Nate
First question. I want to set up a wildcat cartridge that is not included in the cartridge list. I don't have QuickDesign to draw it up and transfer it. What I am looking for is a 7-300 win mag. What I did was copy the 300 win mag data line
.300 Win. Mag.(W) ","93.8","2.62",".308",".5","47.32","430","Piezo CIP","3.34","","","","","","","","","","","","300WINMA.jpg"
and then modified it to my predicted 7-300 win mag case
"7 mm-300 Win. Mag.(W) ","91.8","2.62",".284",".55","40.39","460","Piezo CIP","3.605","","","","","","","","","","","","300WINMA.jpg"
and added it to my "caliber" list. It seems to work quite well. Is this valid enough to estimate the performance of the case? Or would I need to find a better way or beg for someone to develop a file through QuickDesign?
Second question. I have read about most powders being fairly close to the real world, but a few aren't. The one I see referenced regularly is Varget. My question is this... My "wildcat cartridge" seems fairly consistent with other people's load data when evaluating H1000, but not as close when evaluating Retumbo. Many Retumbo loads run by other reloaders are 4 grains less than what QL predicts. Anything funny with Retumbo in QL? Or do I just need to be patient and establish a baseline lower charge with muzzle velocity and then start adjusting QL?
Third question. Anyone have any neat tricks or shortcuts for the novice user? I seem to be struggling a bit on data management, ie. saving loads and organizing how I use the program.
Thanks in advance
Nate