I'd really like to see the Partition with a poly tip,but I'm not sure it would be economically sound for nosler to do it,which is why they haven't. It probably would have been more
feasible if they hadn't already brought out the AccuBond. The Partition would have to be more exspensive with a poly tip and the reasoning behind the AccuBond is a relatively cheap bullet without the exsplosiveness of the ballistic tip,yet the same ballistics and accuracy.
They already have a strong following with the original. You have a large group of customers that don't like the poly tip for whatever reason. Nosler would have to carry both designs,they couldn't simply drop the original. It costs alot of money to market these new bullets. The AccuBond is a success because you have rumors constantly of how the ballistic tip explodes on big game and the AccuBond has put this to sleep.
As for the TSX,I've killed several elk with them,and have been in on several other elk when they were shot with tsx,along with a number of antelope and deer. The TSX is a better design by far. I've still seen inconsistency in exspansion at 30/06 velocities on game,especially antelope and two seperate elk. The exit wounds were only slightly larger then .308 diameter. and were talking under 200 yards. The internal damage wasn't all that impressive and far differant from previous hits with the same combo. I've never ever had a problem with the Partition. Personally I think lead is a known commodity with charateristics that lend itself well to exspansion. Copper isn't as consistant. The best way I've found to reliably get exspansion in the barnes,is to run light bullets at fast impact speeds. Copper has to expand at those violent impact velocities.
I've honestly shot partitions in the 06 out to 500 yards and have had the same results on paper as I've had with ballistic tips. I still don't like the smashed tips,but thats been more mental then anything.
feasible if they hadn't already brought out the AccuBond. The Partition would have to be more exspensive with a poly tip and the reasoning behind the AccuBond is a relatively cheap bullet without the exsplosiveness of the ballistic tip,yet the same ballistics and accuracy.
They already have a strong following with the original. You have a large group of customers that don't like the poly tip for whatever reason. Nosler would have to carry both designs,they couldn't simply drop the original. It costs alot of money to market these new bullets. The AccuBond is a success because you have rumors constantly of how the ballistic tip explodes on big game and the AccuBond has put this to sleep.
As for the TSX,I've killed several elk with them,and have been in on several other elk when they were shot with tsx,along with a number of antelope and deer. The TSX is a better design by far. I've still seen inconsistency in exspansion at 30/06 velocities on game,especially antelope and two seperate elk. The exit wounds were only slightly larger then .308 diameter. and were talking under 200 yards. The internal damage wasn't all that impressive and far differant from previous hits with the same combo. I've never ever had a problem with the Partition. Personally I think lead is a known commodity with charateristics that lend itself well to exspansion. Copper isn't as consistant. The best way I've found to reliably get exspansion in the barnes,is to run light bullets at fast impact speeds. Copper has to expand at those violent impact velocities.
I've honestly shot partitions in the 06 out to 500 yards and have had the same results on paper as I've had with ballistic tips. I still don't like the smashed tips,but thats been more mental then anything.