Pop quickload ?

[old #7]

Can you run this for me?
30-06 AI
H1000
RP case
FED 215
Nos 180 ab
24" bbl
col 3.425

 

[FOTIS]

Too slow even at 110% loading density.

Cartridge : .30-06 Ack Imp
Bullet : .308, 180, Nosler AccuBond 54825
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.425 inch or 87.00 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-10.0 97 54.90 2210 1953 29059 7857 80.2 1.574
-09.0 98 55.51 2240 2005 30037 8009 81.1 1.553
-08.0 99 56.12 2269 2058 31054 8159 82.0 1.531
-07.0 100 56.73 2299 2112 32110 8309 82.9 1.510
-06.0 101 57.34 2329 2168 33209 8457 83.7 1.489
-05.0 103 57.95 2359 2225 34353 8603 84.6 1.468
-04.0 104 58.56 2390 2283 35542 8748 85.4 1.447
-03.0 105 59.17 2421 2342 36780 8890 86.2 1.426
-02.0 106 59.78 2452 2403 38070 9030 87.0 1.403
-01.0 107 60.39 2483 2465 39415 9168 87.8 1.380
+00.0 108 61.00 2515 2528 40818 9303 88.6 1.357
+01.0 109 61.61 2547 2592 42280 9435 89.3 1.335
+02.0 110 62.22 2579 2658 43807 9564 90.1 1.313
+03.0 111 62.83 2611 2725 45400 9689 90.8 1.291
+04.0 112 63.44 2643 2793 47067 9810 91.5 1.269
+05.0 113 64.05 2676 2862 48787 9928 92.1 1.248

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 108 61.00 2710 2935 49133 9836 96.5 1.242
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 108 61.00 2286 2089 33518 8156 76.2 1.491



RL22 is better


Cartridge : .30-06 Ack Imp
Bullet : .308, 180, Nosler AccuBond 54825
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.425 inch or 87.00 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-22

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-10.0 100 57.60 2582 2665 40932 9771 92.3 1.358
-09.0 101 58.24 2614 2732 42406 9902 92.9 1.336
-08.0 102 58.88 2646 2799 43941 10029 93.5 1.314
-07.0 103 59.52 2679 2868 45537 10152 94.0 1.292
-06.0 104 60.16 2711 2938 47200 10272 94.6 1.271
-05.0 105 60.80 2743 3008 48931 10388 95.1 1.250
-04.0 106 61.44 2776 3080 50736 10499 95.6 1.230 ! Near Maximum !
-03.0 107 62.08 2808 3152 52618 10606 96.1 1.209 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 109 62.72 2841 3226 54577 10709 96.5 1.189 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 110 63.36 2873 3300 56626 10807 96.9 1.170 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 111 64.00 2906 3375 58762 10900 97.3 1.151 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.0 112 64.64 2939 3452 60991 10989 97.7 1.132 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 113 65.28 2971 3529 63322 11071 98.0 1.113 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 114 65.92 3004 3607 65759 11149 98.4 1.095 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 115 66.56 3037 3686 68308 11220 98.7 1.077 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 116 67.20 3070 3766 70976 11287 98.9 1.059 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 111 64.00 3065 3754 72431 10733 100.0 1.058 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 111 64.00 2694 2901 47101 10403 89.8 1.270

 

[old #7]

Thanks Pop.
Quickload is right on the money.
I velocity tested rl22 yesterday and got 2860 with 63.0 grs.

 

[FOTIS]

Cool!