G
Guest
Guest
Has anyone used this powder in their 300 RUM with 200 Accubonds? Pros and cons please.
I have read it is temp. sensitive.
Don
I have read it is temp. sensitive.
Don
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
both are double based, so they'll run dirty unless your close to max pressure.DON":qrsxpqd6 said:Thanks for the input everyone. One last question. Which powder is cleaner burning comparing US869 TO RL-25?
Don
DON":27xffky2 said:Charlie,
What velocity deviations do you experience shooting your load from cold weather to hot weather with this powder? Is your gun a 26" barrel?
Thanks,
Don
I've not tried 869 yet, have some just haven't needed it. I've shot a lot of WC872, here is what I've learned about these slow mil-surp powders.DON":12ajp657 said:I may try RL-33 once it hits the market but as I stated earlier it appears it takes more powder to achieve the velocity where I am currently with a max book charge of RL-25. I think RL-25 will be tough to beat. I get superb accuracy too. I developed the load in 35-degree weather at 3059 fps and get 3100-3125 in 80-degree temps.
Having shot ball powder previously produced really good groups. I do remember at 100 grains of Ramshot Magnum Powder heated the barrel faster than 91.5 of RL-25. While Ramshot Magnum burned pretty clean it does raise a concern with US869 especially guys stating 101-108 grain loads getting in the 3200 fps range with 200 AB bullets. Not sure if it will be as clean or not. Plus I'm curious how temp. sensitive US869 is vs RL-25. It will be fun learning the answers as time will allow me the range time. I have my ELK load in RL-25. Now to snag a Colorado leftover tag would be nice. :mrgreen:
Don