Pacobillie
Beginner
- Dec 9, 2020
- 9
- 5
There is no data available for this specific bullet. I know that Rhino recommends using data for traditional bullets of comparable weight.
This is for a 9.3X57, an obsolete cartridge for which there is scarce published data.
The good news is that the rifle is a Husky 146 built on an FN Mauser 98 action, in good condition.
I have tried up to 48.5 grains of H4895 behind that bullet, and had disappointing velocities (2290 fps). Any more powder (H4895) would be a compressed load.
Hence, my desire to try a faster powder. I have H322 on hand. Of course, I would start low and work up.
In theory, 2450 fps should be attainable.
Does anyone have experience with the Rhino or a similar weight bullet and H322 in 9.3X57 in a 98 action? What were your findings?
This is for a 9.3X57, an obsolete cartridge for which there is scarce published data.
The good news is that the rifle is a Husky 146 built on an FN Mauser 98 action, in good condition.
I have tried up to 48.5 grains of H4895 behind that bullet, and had disappointing velocities (2290 fps). Any more powder (H4895) would be a compressed load.
Hence, my desire to try a faster powder. I have H322 on hand. Of course, I would start low and work up.
In theory, 2450 fps should be attainable.
Does anyone have experience with the Rhino or a similar weight bullet and H322 in 9.3X57 in a 98 action? What were your findings?