First let me say hi to everyone. New member here.
Here's my question. We all hear that the 180 gr is the tailor made size for the .30 caliber, even though it can accommodate bullets from 110-220 gr. And, I believe, the 130 gr. is ideal for the .277, 100 gr. for the .257, etc.
As I understand it, if you load with a bullet on the light end of a given caliber's range, the bullets are too short to be efficient (lacking sufficient S.D.?). And on the high end of the range, there is the sacrifice of flat trajectory and velocity. Somewhere in this maximum accuracy must also come into play.
Assuming these are true, and I'm certainly not questioning it, let me ask - is there a mathematical method of determining, based on a rifles given bore size, what size bullet comes closest to the ideal size? If so, please provide. If not, is there some other method that can be used?
Here's my question. We all hear that the 180 gr is the tailor made size for the .30 caliber, even though it can accommodate bullets from 110-220 gr. And, I believe, the 130 gr. is ideal for the .277, 100 gr. for the .257, etc.
As I understand it, if you load with a bullet on the light end of a given caliber's range, the bullets are too short to be efficient (lacking sufficient S.D.?). And on the high end of the range, there is the sacrifice of flat trajectory and velocity. Somewhere in this maximum accuracy must also come into play.
Assuming these are true, and I'm certainly not questioning it, let me ask - is there a mathematical method of determining, based on a rifles given bore size, what size bullet comes closest to the ideal size? If so, please provide. If not, is there some other method that can be used?