Would your rather...

wisconsinteacher

Handloader
Dec 2, 2010
1,980
291
have both 30-06 in the collection shoot the 180 AccuBond or would you try to mix it up a little? I was thinking 180 AccuBond with one and a 165 or 180 PT with the other. What are your thoughts? They are used for deer hunting here in WI.

I have some 165 PT and see that SPS has some 180s for sale.
 
For deer, I see no need for the 180's unless that's all that your rifle shoots well. I prefer the 165's, but frankly, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other, or even 150's for deer. They die easy. All it takes is a good hit in the boiler room with any decent expanding bullet.

With two .30-06's (and I've got two here) I'm real tempted to keep just one load on hand. And I have both rifles sighted in with those 165's at 200 yards.

Keeps things simple for me. I like that.

Regards, Guy
 
Guy has given you excellent advice. It is dreadfully easy to grab the wrong ammunition when you are shooting multiple loads. Don't ask how I know. :oops:
 
I'd get the handiest one to shoot a 180 PT and the heaviest one to shoot a 150 or 165 BT or AB.

Either that or just get both to shoot a 165 AB and BT so you can spend more time at the range shooting under field conditions.
 
I have more than one 30-06 and load 150gr PAR for all my hunting with them.

I do have one that shoots the 150PAR and the Speer 130gr HP to the same POA. The Speer bullet has worked great on the local deer(smaller) for many years. I generally use other rifles that need blooded and are lighter now.
 
Guy has pretty much addressed my feelings.
If its deer only, then the 165 is a great choice. When I hunted with a 06, full time I had only load, and that was the 180 PT. Elk was my primary target, and I don't like mixing loads up. I like to load one one powder, bullet combination for every rifle, no reason to mix things up.
 
If it's going to be a one rifle for all game set up i'd look hard at the 180 grain bullets.
 
I prefer the 165's for deer. But if held to one or the other, would opt for the 180 even though I have used a 165 on elk with no problem.
 
Wincheringen":14hme51q said:
Whichever shoots best.
You have a great point there.
I think most of us based our answers on the assumption that both bullets gave equal accuracy. I know I did.
 
DrMike":d5930fng said:
Guy has given you excellent advice. It is dreadfully easy to grab the wrong ammunition when you are shooting multiple loads. Don't ask how I know. :oops:

Been there done that! :wink:
 
I have multiple 30/06's and luckily all will shoot the 180 Ballistic Tip. They are stout enough that not much else is needed for what I hunt, that and the fact that I have never had Accubonds shoot good from them. From looking at various penetration tests the new Ballistic Tips hang right with the Accubonds through some tough stuff. I have never recovered a Ballistic tip from an animal as all were pass-thrus.

That said my lightweight 700 Titanium gets fed 130gr Barnes TTSX going really fast while the others see the 180 Ballistic Tip if they are getting handloads.
 
In my part of Wis deer hunting is done close range and often in Brushy-twiggy quarters. I have no proof but tend to avoid plastic tipped bullets of any brand. Somehow I imagine twigs deflecting and opening plastic tipped bullets easier. I have no problem loading 150 grain lead tipped bullets under Max for whitetails. I've killed and seen killed a pile of deer w/ 308 and 3006 w/150's. Guess if I wanted to go the extra mile I'd be loading partitions.
 
I'd probably just run PTs and call it a day if they shoot well for you. A 30-06 and 180 seem to go together really well. Or you could go the other direction and try the 150 PTs or ABs. A hot stepping 30-06 load would be slick for antelope or deer.
 
Back
Top