Which would you choose?
- Thread starter Blkram
- Start date
GregoryB.
Beginner
- Feb 5, 2022
- 201
- 432
I agree with WVBuckBuster on the NBT. 98% of my loads are with this bullet in a multitude of calibers. Always find a load that shoots well with minimal effort.
I agree. In the "premium" bullet lineup I've used PTs, NABs and ABLRs, TTX and TTSX.
All have worked as advertised.
Thank you for posting that comment. I tried Accubonds in my .338RUM and could not get them to shoot to the accuracy level I was looking for. The Partition on the other hand did an excellent job both in the accuracy Department and the Elk Department.
- Oct 30, 2004
- 24,779
- 4,527
Bullet all the way.
TTSX, LRX, Hammers (tipped hammer if possible) and ..unfortunately now defunct...GS Custom.
Accubonds also make the list (NOT ABLR's)
TTSX, LRX, Hammers (tipped hammer if possible) and ..unfortunately now defunct...GS Custom.
Accubonds also make the list (NOT ABLR's)
I tried the 150 gr. ABLRs in three 7x57 rifls and a .280 Remington. None of the rifles liked that bullet. Too bad. It's a really good looking bullet.
Paul B.
I use them in my .270Win and a 300WM and they shoot well.
One thing I learned is they're really particular in the amount of jump. I initially tried the standard starting point of 0.020 from the lands and it sucked.. 2-3MOA at 100yds. I then back-up up, and regrouped using the Nosler recommended OAL as a starting point and both went to sub MOA. I now use them rather than PTs, because I find the performance just as good, while they're slightly more accurate in my rifles.
