I, too, believe that Nightforce scopes are largely Japanese and assembled here in the U.S.
I also highly doubt that Redfield glass is made in the USA, even if the rest of the components are. Regardless of where it is assembled or where it's parts come from, I won't be buying another one.
I...
Very neat test, David. Thanks for sharing. You are braver than me, shooting through a chrono at 300 yds.
I'm pretty sure it was your camera flash causing the chrono to indicate an error. The flash definitely went off on the first photo - you can see the camera, flash, and hands holding the...
I got a pretty decent deal on a used VX3 for my 35 Whelen. I'll let you guys know how it stacks up to the other scopes I have in this price range after I get to do some testing with it... to my eyes anyway.
I agree. If you look at the URL of the image FOTIS posted, it is a link to Sinclair's page for Leupold QRW bases. I'd be surprised if they didn't use QRW rings in the photo.
http://www.sinclairintl.com/.aspx/pid=40810/Product/Leupold-QRW-Series-2-Piece-Bases
I'm terrible at this. I do it all the time. I think I'm actually at a point now that things will be staying where they are for the most part. I certainly won't put any guarantees on that though.
Unless I'm mistaken, this is the 9.3x66 Sako, essentially a 9.3-06 improved... or for Scotty's benefit we can call it a 9.3 Whelen.
I bet you like it more now, don't you Scotty?
I had a look at the VX3. The change in eye relief is very apparent across the range of magnification... but the eye relief at 2.5X is very non critical and would allow one to mount the scope set at 8X and maintain the same cheek weld throughout the range of magnification. It's a tough decision...
As the Minox is the other big contender here, I might take my ZA5 in to the shop and do a side by side comparison. My Minox is a 3-15 and I would be looking to get a 1.5-8 or 2-10, but it would give me a good of idea of how they compare. The Minox has generous, constant, and non critical eye...
I guess I'm going to have to give the VX3 a really good look for myself. It certainly seems as though the eye relief comes down to personal preference. The VX3 appeals to me largely because of it's weight. I'm going to try to keep the Whelen as light and low profile as possible.
I'm not trying to slight Leupold, it just doesn't seem to promote consistency. I suppose if you mount the scope with it set in the center of the range, that you will only have to move a half inch from that point. I also suppose that generous non critical eye relief could largely negate any...
It is true, we all see things a little differently. I can see that it might be possible for someone to compare a Revolution to an Elite 4200 and walk away saying they were pretty similar. It certainly wasn't the case for me, but I could see it happening. I think it's a real stretch saying that...
I'll respectfully disagree with that. I had a Revolution and it didn't come anywhere close to competing with my Elite 4200, let alone my Conquests. It was reasonably bright but the clarity wasn't there and the contrast left a lot to be desired. I'd take an Elite 3200 over a Revolution.
I think...
I wrap mine in rope between layers to make the pattern. It is super easy and yields softer edges than tape.
Looking forward to seeing the finished product.
I'm going to exchange the high rings that came with my 1A and am unsure if I should go with the mediums or lows.
I'm planning on a 32-36mm objective, so I'd like to hear what people are using on their rifles with similar scopes. Clearance for loading/unloading the rifle is also of concern. Has...
Thanks, guys.
Well, Guy, since I already "ruined" your year:
http://www.gunsinternational.com/Ruger-No-1-30-06-Sprg.cfm?gun_id=100195468
It could use a refinishing job on the stock, but it's got a pretty nice piece of wood.