remingtonman_25_06
Handloader
- Nov 17, 2005
- 2,806
- 403
Well after all the headache from my 264 and 140 amaxs, my 243 is taking a different approach with the 105 amax.
I started with H1000 at 45, 46, and 47g, and it showed promise the first time out at 47g. Now I am only able to load these out to mag length which is 2.785" which is roughly .065" off the lands. I wasn't expecting these to shoot worth a crap, and if they did, I'd figure I'd have to find the shorter sweet spot for them but low and behold they are holding .5" at 100 so far on 2 different occasions.
Tried the OAL test on them at 47g H1000. Seated them .040" deeper from 2.785" and they got worse, so the mag length in this case is the best, even though they are .065" off the lands.
47g is getting 3000fps, 47.5g should be getting me 3025-3050fps from my 24" bbl'ed Rem 700 ADL S/S.
I started with H1000 at 45, 46, and 47g, and it showed promise the first time out at 47g. Now I am only able to load these out to mag length which is 2.785" which is roughly .065" off the lands. I wasn't expecting these to shoot worth a crap, and if they did, I'd figure I'd have to find the shorter sweet spot for them but low and behold they are holding .5" at 100 so far on 2 different occasions.
Tried the OAL test on them at 47g H1000. Seated them .040" deeper from 2.785" and they got worse, so the mag length in this case is the best, even though they are .065" off the lands.
47g is getting 3000fps, 47.5g should be getting me 3025-3050fps from my 24" bbl'ed Rem 700 ADL S/S.