Based on the results I saw today, I am going to make the 129gr Hornady SST my primary load for this fall. The accuracy with that bullet in my rifle is exceptional, and I saw nothing in the test today to indicate that it would not perform at least as adequately as a similar cup-and-core bullet, such as the TGK. The fact that it retained more weight than the TGK is also a plus in my book.
However...there is a part of me that really wants to see how those 130gr GKHP's would perform on game. If the test was any indication, I would expect massive internal damage, maybe knocking the deer right off its feet. The downside would be a very real possibility of a mess to clean up on the inside, bloodshot meat, and shrapnel around the wound channel. Maybe if I'm doing a late season doe patrol and my buck tag has already been filled, I'll try it just to satisfy my curiosity. We'll see.
I might do some further experimentation with the TGK and another powder to see if that makes a difference. Probably won't be until next year, maybe do that along with load development on the 129gr ABLR.
Now on to other things...
However...there is a part of me that really wants to see how those 130gr GKHP's would perform on game. If the test was any indication, I would expect massive internal damage, maybe knocking the deer right off its feet. The downside would be a very real possibility of a mess to clean up on the inside, bloodshot meat, and shrapnel around the wound channel. Maybe if I'm doing a late season doe patrol and my buck tag has already been filled, I'll try it just to satisfy my curiosity. We'll see.
I might do some further experimentation with the TGK and another powder to see if that makes a difference. Probably won't be until next year, maybe do that along with load development on the 129gr ABLR.
Now on to other things...