Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
+1 this!35 Whelen":2lecqex1 said:1Shot has summed it up exactly for you!
There is your answer from someone that has had
Vast experience with the 25 Whelen, why go against
Someone that has been there and done it! And Guybo's comment
on oweing It to the animal; To do your very best, to dispatch it correctly
Rings so TRUE with me.
amenGuybo":2nq7uwu2 said:I personally would never use a bullet designed for varmits on deer, not even small deer. It may have been done before and there may be some still doing it but I think we owe it to the animal that we're hunting to try and dispatch it quickly and humanely and to use a bullet designed to do just that. I agree there's just to much potential for bullet failure and a wounded unrecovered animal with this combo.
FOTIS":ham90c5b said:Even the 100 grain ones
mccraggen said:Has anyone had any luck with this combo? I’m thinking of using it for a flat shooting hard hitting combo and maybe white tail, would it have enough oomph for a smaller deer species?
i've pondered this question and come back to it a couple times and read the responses. i love the speed and accuracy I get with the 75's -- for prairie dogs and anything under 300 yards. I also recall my personal learning curve about BC, energy, trajectory, bullet construction, etc. as i got deeper into this cartridge. We all had to start somewhere!
Keeping in mind goal of flat shooting and hard hitting, I ran Ballistics calcs for the Vmax and the 100 gr. BT's.
Vmax @ 3700 fps 300 yd zero: At 500 yds. 715 ft/lbs energy and 22.62" drop. 2073 fps.
100 BT@ 3375 fps 300 yd zero: At 500 yds. 1275 ft/lbs energy and 21.39" drop. 2351 fps.
So, as far as hard hitting goes, no contest. Trajectory almost identical, so flat shooting the same. The BT was recommended by several here for deer. Hope this info helps!
EE2
cloverleaf":34fwcxij said:FOTIS":34fwcxij said:Even the 100 grain ones
+1 100 Gr BT's have never failed to canvas antelope for me.... CL
rjm158":1iv9twvu said:cloverleaf":1iv9twvu said:FOTIS":1iv9twvu said:Even the 100 grain ones
+1 100 Gr BT's have never failed to canvas antelope for me.... CL
I started loading 100 BT's because that was the weight recommended to me by a friend who swore by the 25-06 for whitetails. In all the years and deer since then, I've never had one fail or had a reason to doubt their effectiveness.
Not trying to start an argument, or casting any doubt on your shooting skill, but in my opinion taking head shots is an iffy proposition. If you move, the deer moves, the earth moves, whatever, then the possibility exists for the deer to be severely injured and escape. There have been reports/photos of deer who have had their lower jaw shot off and this in turn means they are doomed to starvation unless someone else kills them. As for me, I will take body shots only, preferably behind the shoulder, and only if I have a plausible angle.
Just my .02.
Ron
mccraggen":3vjk1l03 said:Where I live deer aren’t really considered a game species as they are introduced, so it would be most likely a head shot I’m going for
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rjm158":1obis2dp said:mccraggen":1obis2dp said:Where I live deer aren’t really considered a game species as they are introduced, so it would be most likely a head shot I’m going for
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CL, I quoted you because I agreed with your post. My second paragraph was in reference to mccraggen's post. Sorry for the confusion.
Ron