Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Alderman":2e65rqzk said:I find if I am shooting more often it is easier to determine if I am shooting well. (By my standards). If I am away from the bench for a while it is a guessing game.
Horsethief":1p2wkshh said:Some days the accuracy or luck isn't there, for what ever reason or compounded reasons. Mirage, cross winds, swirling winds, distractions from other shooters such as a loud-mouth range snob filling the air with his "guidance" or "experience" can erode otherwise good times.
Horsethief":2trrvuei said:Heat rising from the ground alters your view of the target. Many times the target appears to have a wave-like movement. The more heat rising from the ground, the greater or heavier the wave motion. Add to this a cross wind and the waves will appear to move at an angle. The greater the wind, the more angled or horizontal the waves.
A rising mirage will make the target appear higher than it is. A cross wind and mirage will make the target appear to be to the right or to the left of its true location.
If you hunt in cold weather, you're likely never to encounter mirage. It is possible if the sun breaks through and the air begins to heat up quickly. Last but not least, the greater your distance from the target the more the mirage will throw you off the true target.
RaySendero":3ll5oolc said:S__tuff, happens.
Things can go south for you at unexpected times from unexpected reasons.
Part of the "FUN" of shooting is the trouble-shooting learning process.
I do have a rifle that is very finicky.
One load - I can't get to shoot under 2.5".
While another load will do 1/2".
Figuring one out took patience and range time.
Yet, have another rifle I use for both targets and hunting:
This rifle was accurate even unusual in that it would shoot a variety of different weight bullets into what would look like the same group at 100 yards under 3/4". I had over 400 cases but with 5 different mfgs. I would batch load these cases by head stamp in quantities of 60 to 90.
After a couple of years accuracy really when south - I tried everything I could think of to figure out. Finally, changed the scope and that seemed to fix it. But after another 2 yrs the problem returned. That's when I found that the Federal cases in my reloading rotation were causing accuracy the problem as I had, coincidently, use up all those reloads the 1st time trying to figure out the problem at the same time I changed that scope.
RAY":191ybfw1 said:What was wrong with the federal cases ?
RAY":2ggo86v8 said:Thanks guys , I know you guys have been doing this for years and your answers sound a lot more logical than other mumbo jumbo I've read.
It makes since , to have an accurate rifle to begin with and keeping things consistent seem like a reliable formula.
Thanks again !
Ray.
Guy Miner":2rgn2e1h said:RAY":2rgn2e1h said:Thanks guys , I know you guys have been doing this for years and your answers sound a lot more logical than other mumbo jumbo I've read.
It makes since , to have an accurate rifle to begin with and keeping things consistent seem like a reliable formula.
Thanks again !
Ray.
Ray - I was a law enforcement sniper for almost 20 years. My rifle HAD to be on. Always. So I got a great rifle-builder to put together a very simple, rugged rifle.
I kept the same scope, mounts, sling, ammo, and sight-in distance for the 19 years, doing very little experimenting with anything. I made a very few minor changes over the years, but minor. And in the case of swapping a scope - it was just temporary.
That rifle taught me that the rifle/scope/ammo could be incredibly consistent.
Yet some months my training targets were really, really good. Sometimes not.
Sometimes I'd win a rifle match with it, other times I'd be middle of the pack. Sigh...
It wasn't the rifle/scope or ammo... :mrgreen:
Regards, Guy