HodgemanAK
Beginner
- Oct 23, 2020
- 240
- 220
I've been using my .300WSM as a primary hunting rifle for a number of years and it has seen a number of rounds- rough guess is 1k or so. In doing load development for the E-Tip, I measured the distance to the lands for the first time in well over a decade and came up with a OAL to lands of 2.927". The factory OAL is 2.80" with a max magazine length of 2.875"
Looking at CBTO with the E-Tip- the CBTO to lands is 2.371" and CBTO when loading to book length is 2.188" giving me a jump of 0.183". I know E-Tips like some jump... but wow.
I went and measured similar with my long favorite 180AB loads and got a CBTO to lands of 2.366". CBTO at book OAL 2.80" (same as factory ammo) of 2.184" for a jump of 0.182".
It seems odd that I could load to absolute max magazine length of 2.875" and still be more than 0.100" from lands with either load. That seems like a lot, but I've not measured a bunch of throats to date.
All that to say, are those numbers seeming routine? I know in the ye olde days the CW was to seat bullets out to 0.020" (or even touching!) the lands. I get that there might be some design consideration to keep people from jamming a bullet in the lands, but I can't even get closer than 100 thousandths. Or has the interim shooting just eroded the throat to the point that the lands are just further that much further away?
I've heard of people setting back a barrel, but I always associated it with rifles shot a whole lot more than I've shot this one.
Looking at CBTO with the E-Tip- the CBTO to lands is 2.371" and CBTO when loading to book length is 2.188" giving me a jump of 0.183". I know E-Tips like some jump... but wow.
I went and measured similar with my long favorite 180AB loads and got a CBTO to lands of 2.366". CBTO at book OAL 2.80" (same as factory ammo) of 2.184" for a jump of 0.182".
It seems odd that I could load to absolute max magazine length of 2.875" and still be more than 0.100" from lands with either load. That seems like a lot, but I've not measured a bunch of throats to date.
All that to say, are those numbers seeming routine? I know in the ye olde days the CW was to seat bullets out to 0.020" (or even touching!) the lands. I get that there might be some design consideration to keep people from jamming a bullet in the lands, but I can't even get closer than 100 thousandths. Or has the interim shooting just eroded the throat to the point that the lands are just further that much further away?
I've heard of people setting back a barrel, but I always associated it with rifles shot a whole lot more than I've shot this one.