Oldtrader3
Ammo Smith
- Nov 6, 2009
- 8,406
- 6
Elmer, the order of things optic may align a little different in this country and Canada (i.e. Leupold, Zeiss and Swarovski) for quality and sales support. S&B and Leica are up there, as well, but just have not had the sales effort here that they get in Europe. I have been unable to harvest game because of scope failure (fogging, lens alignment) but am very fortunate to have not lost injured game because of damaged optics and related inability to accurately harvest an animal, knock on wood. That is a sad state of affairs which in my life is passed now.
I hear laments all the time from people who have bought an expensive rifle and want to save by cutting optics cost, limiting themselves to some arbitrary number. They do not realize in every case they could get by with less rifle and more scope. I have about (10) scoped rifles and in every case, the scope cost more to purchase than the rifle it is mounted on. My gun safe is heavily leveraged in Zeiss optics, as a result. I also own several Leupold's but they aren't cheap anymore.
I hear laments all the time from people who have bought an expensive rifle and want to save by cutting optics cost, limiting themselves to some arbitrary number. They do not realize in every case they could get by with less rifle and more scope. I have about (10) scoped rifles and in every case, the scope cost more to purchase than the rifle it is mounted on. My gun safe is heavily leveraged in Zeiss optics, as a result. I also own several Leupold's but they aren't cheap anymore.