Guy Miner
Master Loader
- Apr 6, 2006
- 17,840
- 6,323
Why is it that there is such a wide discrepancy in how hunters look at the black bear?
Some consider him a nuisance, a pest. Hardly worth the effort to shoot.
Some consider him easy to kill and rely on small caliber rifles - I've read posts advocating the use of a little .223 and Barnes bullets. A friend of mine who grew up in small logging towns in British Columbia told me that he and his brother used to kill black bears with their .22 rimfires!
Others look on the bear as highly regarded game.
Some advocate using large, powerful rifles.
Some talk of how far a wounded bear can run, and how faint the blood trail, even from a good hit, can be. One fellow I know, who has killed over 20 himself, and has been in on the killing of probably twice that many, has a tremendous respect for how far and fast a wounded bear can travel. He's the one who urged me to "hit it again" when the bear squarely hit by my son, started running off. That bear was still running fast, though dragging a fore-leg, after being hit by a .30-06, a 7mm mag, and my .375...
It's interesting to read the different opinions on how tough the black bear is, or isn't.
I've limited experience actually tagging bear (only one) though I've hunted them a number of times. I tend to respect the black bear as a worthy game animal, sometimes hard to locate, and hard to approach for a shot. All spot & stalk hunting here in Washington now, no baiting. I also tend to respect the bear's ability to run and run, over incredibly steep and brushy terrain, when wounded or frightened. I also tend to respect the potential he has for being dangerous.
That last one can get a fellow laughed at - but... bears have eaten a fair number of people over the years, so I'm at least going to give those claws, fangs, and all that strength a certain respect.
Why do you suppose there is such a wide variety of different thoughts about the black bear?
What's your opinion of the bear, as a game animal?
Thanks! Guy
Some consider him a nuisance, a pest. Hardly worth the effort to shoot.
Some consider him easy to kill and rely on small caliber rifles - I've read posts advocating the use of a little .223 and Barnes bullets. A friend of mine who grew up in small logging towns in British Columbia told me that he and his brother used to kill black bears with their .22 rimfires!
Others look on the bear as highly regarded game.
Some advocate using large, powerful rifles.
Some talk of how far a wounded bear can run, and how faint the blood trail, even from a good hit, can be. One fellow I know, who has killed over 20 himself, and has been in on the killing of probably twice that many, has a tremendous respect for how far and fast a wounded bear can travel. He's the one who urged me to "hit it again" when the bear squarely hit by my son, started running off. That bear was still running fast, though dragging a fore-leg, after being hit by a .30-06, a 7mm mag, and my .375...
It's interesting to read the different opinions on how tough the black bear is, or isn't.
I've limited experience actually tagging bear (only one) though I've hunted them a number of times. I tend to respect the black bear as a worthy game animal, sometimes hard to locate, and hard to approach for a shot. All spot & stalk hunting here in Washington now, no baiting. I also tend to respect the bear's ability to run and run, over incredibly steep and brushy terrain, when wounded or frightened. I also tend to respect the potential he has for being dangerous.
That last one can get a fellow laughed at - but... bears have eaten a fair number of people over the years, so I'm at least going to give those claws, fangs, and all that strength a certain respect.
Why do you suppose there is such a wide variety of different thoughts about the black bear?
What's your opinion of the bear, as a game animal?
Thanks! Guy