chronos and sun

OU812

Handloader
Apr 18, 2006
2,099
2
Well I just returned from the range with my 8mm and was quite surprised at the lower than expected velocities. The 4 shot ave was 2850 for a 200 tsx, fed 215, 81.5 7828, chrono setting level at 12 feet. My range faces East so my chrono was setting East-West with the sun at a 45 degree angle (give or take a degree or 2) to the back of the chrono, I had my sky screens on. I got no errors and no real odd ball velocities other than being less than I figured. Could the angle of the sun have caused or shown a slower than expected velocity?

Thoughts?

Bill
 
I know my chrono has been ultra sensitive to sun blazing directly on it, but mine gave some big errors and wouldn't read at all.

How close are you to a max load and what kinda speed is the book saying you should be getting Bill. Might be enough excuse to push a little more, although I'm betting an elk would never notice. It is a very good shooting load so you always have something to fall back to. The good thing is TSXs usually respond well with more speed. Scotty
 
Scotty,

Fotis ran a quick load for me and I am about 1 grain below "near max". QL says 3070 at 82.6 grains near max. Nice thing is cases are not stretching, primer pockets still tight but this is only 3 firings. I was figuring on 3000 fps but every gun is different. As accurate as this load is I can't see my self doing much else than going with 2850. Like you said no elk will ever know the difference and I'm Ok with it if they are.

Bill
 
Noslers load data for their 200 gr. spitzer shows.

IMR7828
Max. 83.5 gr. 2930 - 98% case fill
81.5 gr. 2850 - 95%
79.5 gr. 2770 - 93% being the accuracy load.
 
Good point Bill and your right about every rifle being different. Seems like a good load to me Bill. I know I would have a hard time messing with it. Chronos are the death of many great loads. Scotty
 
NoelW":26a8ojxd said:
Noslers load data for their 200 gr. spitzer shows.

IMR7828
Max. 83.5 gr. 2930 - 98% case fill
81.5 gr. 2850 - 95%
79.5 gr. 2770 - 93% being the accuracy load.

So maybe the 2850 with the tsx is right on the money.
 
Quick load is just an estimate.
Velocities can change 200 fps just changing brass and primers.
Not that is always will, but it sure can.
 
I guess if I want more speed I'll shoot 180's until then I'll keep .5 moa @ 2850.

Bill
 
Maybe try some Retumbo, but don't know if the case will hold enough for any gains. If the case will hold enough you will probably see 100-150 fps gain without sacrificing any accuracy with a 26" or longer barrel. Sometime accuracy even improves. Although I doubt it will get better than .5.
 
NoelW":1ppsiwkw said:
Maybe try some Retumbo, but don't know if the case will hold enough for any gains. If the case will hold enough you will probably see 100-150 fps gain without sacrificing any accuracy with a 26" or longer barrel. Sometime accuracy even improves. Although I doubt it will get better than .5.


Noel my gun has a 24 inch barrel. I'm not disapointed at the speed just thought it would have been a little higher. I'm pleased with the accuracy and the speed is fine but I'm sure I will try other powders, retumbo, RL-25 and would like to try N560 but I stand a better chance in getting pregnant than finding that around here.

Bill
 
OU812":287b3pu1 said:
but I stand a better chance in getting pregnant than finding that around here.

Bill

Now that was funny!

What about RL22 Bill? Think it would be a good powder as well. Seems like if 7828 works, then RL22 should work as well in some cases. Scotty
 
beretzs":30feoyfs said:
OU812":30feoyfs said:
but I stand a better chance in getting pregnant than finding that around here.

Bill

Now that was funny!

What about RL22 Bill? Think it would be a good powder as well. Seems like if 7828 works, then RL22 should work as well in some cases. Scotty

Your right Scotty it would be a very good choice, maybe next on my list to try. I've seen in several place that RL22 is used quite often in the 8 with favorable results.

Bill
 
OU812":2qleej94 said:
beretzs":2qleej94 said:
OU812":2qleej94 said:
but I stand a better chance in getting pregnant than finding that around here.

Bill

Now that was funny!

What about RL22 Bill? Think it would be a good powder as well. Seems like if 7828 works, then RL22 should work as well in some cases. Scotty

Your right Scotty it would be a very good choice, maybe next on my list to try. I've seen in several place that RL22 is used quite often in the 8 with favorable results.

Bill

Overall, RL22 has been excellent in the 270WSM, 7WSM, 7RM, 300WM and even a few others. I just like to try it, if it fits. Seems to work better for me accuracy wise than a few others and man, it always turns in great speeds as well. Scotty
 
beretzs":12je553j said:
Good point Bill and your right about every rifle being different. Seems like a good load to me Bill. I know I would have a hard time messing with it. Chronos are the death of many great loads. Scotty

To me chrono's are the birth of a good load. For hunting, imho, velocity is a must. If it don't shoot fast it don't count. I want a good group and top velocity. One thing is for sure, every rifle is different.
 
A dark colored sharpie and some bullet painting works well.
 
Just looking at what you've posted wouldn't lead me to conclude that you were getting aberrant readings. I am aware that shooting into the setting sun with the Oehler can distort readings, but I haven't observed that phenomenon with my Chrony. I do shoot early on many days with the sun at 180 degrees to the target, and I can't say that I've ever observed an aberrant reading I could correlate to position of the sun. On the whole, it sounds as if you have an enviable rifle and a good load for it.
 
DrMike":vz3ln4px said:
Just looking at what you've posted wouldn't lead me to conclude that you were getting aberrant readings. I am aware that shooting into the setting sun with the Oehler can distort readings, but I haven't observed that phenomenon with my Chrony. I do shoot early on many days with the sun at 180 degrees to the target, and I can't say that I've ever observed an aberrant reading I could correlate to position of the sun. On the whole, it sounds as if you have an enviable rifle and a good load for it.

The load is good but I thought it would have had a little more steam to it. Going to keep this load for sure but I'm sure I will tinker with other powders, RL25, RL22, and try running up to max with 7828.
 
Bruce Mc":3lewddd5 said:
beretzs":3lewddd5 said:
Good point Bill and your right about every rifle being different. Seems like a good load to me Bill. I know I would have a hard time messing with it. Chronos are the death of many great loads. Scotty

To me chrono's are the birth of a good load. For hunting, imho, velocity is a must. If it don't shoot fast it don't count. I want a good group and top velocity. One thing is for sure, every rifle is different.

Your right about that Bruce but I have seen folks scrap excellent loads in order to get another 50-100 FPS. I like speed as much or more than the next guy. Heck I'm guilty of the same thing. I just revamped my 150gr PT load since it was only running 3000. I wanted 3100! It only took another grain and a half and I was there plus I kept the accuracy but I am doubting any deer would have noticed. But I did! Scotty
 
Having a load that is as flat shooting as possible gives me a little more confidence when I'm in the field. Especially when you're thinking about that 600 yd cross canyon on a big'un. Shooting that far is kinda iffy for me, but I still think about it and want a load that can handle it.
 
Bruce Mc":3f2jnkej said:
Having a load that is as flat shooting as possible gives me a little more confidence when I'm in the field. Especially when you're thinking about that 600 yd cross canyon on a big'un. Shooting that far is kinda iffy for me, but I still think about it and want a load that can handle it.

I too want a load to be as flat as possible but I won't give up accuracy to get it. But then again that's what turrets and practice are for.
 
Back
Top