I didn't mean to knock his experiment. The writer of that article is a super famous name in the sport and has forgotten more about it than I'll probably ever know!!
I'm just saying it was a little wierd that testing "hunting" caliber plain jane seating dies at a case neck tension that you wouldn't normally get from the "partner" sizing die that would go with it.
As he proved even a plain jain RCBS does a pretty good job of seating with a tension of .002"
I know that after changing the mandrels on my lee collet dies to make more tension rcbs dies (and others like it) quickly start producing less stellar results seating. If you add another problem common today which is fancy bullet tips that don't match the "cup" in the seating stem it can really get nasty in a hurry.
All this is why its fun to have the concentricity checkers to see how well your brass is doing after sizing.....and then after seating. Whether or not it really means a huge difference to ALL guns becomes another can of worms real quick cause runnout does not necessarily make a big difference in all guns.
I'm just saying it was a little wierd that testing "hunting" caliber plain jane seating dies at a case neck tension that you wouldn't normally get from the "partner" sizing die that would go with it.
As he proved even a plain jain RCBS does a pretty good job of seating with a tension of .002"
I know that after changing the mandrels on my lee collet dies to make more tension rcbs dies (and others like it) quickly start producing less stellar results seating. If you add another problem common today which is fancy bullet tips that don't match the "cup" in the seating stem it can really get nasty in a hurry.
All this is why its fun to have the concentricity checkers to see how well your brass is doing after sizing.....and then after seating. Whether or not it really means a huge difference to ALL guns becomes another can of worms real quick cause runnout does not necessarily make a big difference in all guns.