gerry
Ammo Smith
- Mar 1, 2007
- 6,786
- 1,478
I was thinking about this today. I was wondering about the 17 Hornet since it burns so little powder (8-12 gr on average) but I'm thinking 223 Remington might be actually cheaper even though it burns about 22-29 gr of powder on average for 50-55 gr bullets. The brass for 223's can be had pretty cheaply and on average .224 bullets are less expensive than .17's.
What do you guys and gals think?
While we are on the subject what would the handgun round be that gives the best bang for the buck?
What do you guys and gals think?
While we are on the subject what would the handgun round be that gives the best bang for the buck?