Light Reading

[Vince]

With the Supreme Court we currently have we might be able to get the western lands back in the hands of it’s rightful owners.

Understanding the Constitution: Why most federal land holdings are unconstitutional and why you should care - Independence Institute

Here’s the most important underlying cause of the fires: federal land ownership.

i2i.org

 

[clearwater]

Much of the worst wildfires are not traditional woodlands anymore. They are now in cities and towns and ag land, private property where damages are much more expensive.

Writer dismisses lands not National Parks as scrub and woodlands of little use.

States don't have resources to manage large amounts of land.

Private owners won't guarantee good wildlife habitat, fire reduction, weed control, pollution control, recreation opportunities for the general populace.

The idea that Federal Lands are not in the constitution is pretty obtuse, not real obvious.

Perhaps we should go back to the ignored agreements of the last two centuries and return land to the original inhabitants. The local tribes seem to be doing a great job with habitat and rebuilding species that were once extirpated.

 

[Vince]

“States don't have resources to manage large amounts of land.”

That’s a fallacy dreamed up by the libtards that want a big federal government. If they had the land they would have the resources from that land.

Vince