Loading for the new .375...

Guy Miner

Master Loader
Apr 6, 2006
17,880
6,546
I'll need to scope this rifle to do some serious load evaluation, but am starting to learn a bit about it already.

The rifle magazine & chamber accept factory loaded .375's just fine, but won't take most of the ammo I've loaded for the Ruger Number One. The Ruger has a very long throat, and I've been loading the cartridges long for that rifle. They just don't even fit in the magazine of the Model 70:


But, I do have some 300 gr Sierras loaded to factory length:


If I'm going to run it this season, for bear, elk, or even (ahem) deer, I'll need to get something loaded up quickly. On hand I've got a pile of bullets, notably a lot of Hornady 270 & 300 gr bullets, as well as a smattering of Sierras, Speers and Nosler bullets.

H4350 has proven excellent with the 300's and good with the 270's.

RL-15 has been superb with the 260 gr Noslers.

But those results were loaded long, and fired from the Ruger. Looking forward to exploring the capabilities of this Model 70!

Guy
 
I do believe you will be pleased with this rifle, Guy. It is assuredly a handsome rifle, that's for sure.
 
Typically, custom rifles are built to shoot with a particular load and are guaranteed some level of accuracy with that load. Since the Stockmaker/Smith is still around, maybe he can tell you what he optimized for loads?
 
Guy, I would bet your RL15/260 AB load will shoot just fine, if you can shorten them up enough to fit the mag box. Although, that 300 grain Sierra looks like a super bullet as well, and might just be enough for those enormous deer you have out West! :twisted:

I am looking forward to seeing what that big 375 does though. It just looks all class. I can't imagine it doesn't shoot excellent, and I haven't heard of many 375 barrels being worn out, so I am betting it won't take much to get it up and running.
 
Thanks guys. I'm going to try that RL-15 load, with 260 & 270 gr bullets soon, just shortening the cartridge up to fit the Winchester's magazine. It's already at Nosler's minimum recommended powder charge, so I should be plenty safe.

Am thinking my 300 gr Rockchuck loads will do for deer or bear, maybe even elk, if the shot is carefully placed... Wouldn't want to over-stress the Sierra Boat Tail bullet now... :grin:

Guy
 
I don't know but you might wan to stick to Partitions for large Rock Chucks! The Sierra's may blow up!
 
Guy, let us know what you're starting and max charge of RL15 ends up being.

Sent from my LG-E971 using Tapatalk 4
 
Guy,

I agree with Scotty. I would try your proven load with RL 15 and the 260 gr AB and just seat the bullets to cycle through your magazine.

JD338
 
boomer68, I doubt I go to "max" level loads.

Nosler's minimum of 69 gr RL-15 and their 260 AccuBond is good for 2620 fps from my Number One. That's still a bit over 4,000 ft lbs of energy at the muzzle. Sighted in at 200 yards, it's about 9" low at 300 and dumped a black bear quickly at that range. It's also sub MOA out of the Ruger, which I didn't expect, though the .375 is noted for accuracy.

I won't be surprised if I just end up sticking to about 69 or 70 grains of RL-15 and the 260 AccuBond for a lighter bullet load. There's quite a bit more velocity to be had, but I really like the way that load shoots.

75 gr H4350 moves a 300 grainer at over 2500 fps from that Number One and is also gratifyingly accurate.

Those are my two proven, regular .375 loads. I'll likely give them both a try in the Model 70 before messing around with anything else. Did get a tip to try the standard 210 large rifle primer, rather than the 215 I've been using. I might just try that.

OT3, I haven't seen a rockchuck in a month or so. I think it got too hot for them over here and they went back underground... But if I do, I'll try for a repeat on that 300 gr Rockchuck adventure! :grin:

Regards, Guy
 
Back
Top