jockperkins
Beginner
- Dec 31, 2011
- 38
- 0
Everyone,
I had posted earlier problems with loose primer pockets on my 280AI. If you remember correctly, I was using Nosler brass, 60.0 grains of RL22, 160 grain Accubonds and CCI 250 primers.
Update: per suggestions offered by JD338 I fireformed brass from regular 280 Remington virgin casings and then loaded the aforementioned using the same dies, bullets etc. etc. etc. I made sure to use the same dimensions in terms of case length, etc. as well. The only difference was the weight of the virgin Remington brass which sorted to 10 grains heavier than the Nosler casings I had been using (which should have created more pressure theoretically). I shot two rounds of the load I had been using (each casing fired two times), which was enlarging the primer pockets on the Nosler brass. The primer pockets held on the Remington brass with no increase in internal diameter. I just hand primed these fireformed and fired 2x cases (for a total of 3x firings) and the primers seat with the same pressure of the original, virgin, unfired brass.
I am not here to beat on anyone -- or Nosler, the company that I think, for the most part, does things the "right" way (love their bullets, guns etc.). But it wasn't the reamer dimensions or the the way the gunsmith cut the chamber. Nosler brass in the 280AI configuration is too soft and prone to primer pocket loosening from the first firing ( and I have brass from multiple lots). Now, you should know that I have 500 casings of Nosler in the 204 Ruger configuration that I will continue to use ,no problems with them, even when I run pressures hunting in warmer temps. But their supplier of 280AI brass needs to re-think their formula or pour a heavier, heartier lot. Until that time, I will be forced to fireform from Remington and sort (cull) by weight, length and concentricity. This is one thing that Nosler does right on their brass. Virtually eliminating the need for this process. Lets hope Nosler listens and looks into this...
I had posted earlier problems with loose primer pockets on my 280AI. If you remember correctly, I was using Nosler brass, 60.0 grains of RL22, 160 grain Accubonds and CCI 250 primers.
Update: per suggestions offered by JD338 I fireformed brass from regular 280 Remington virgin casings and then loaded the aforementioned using the same dies, bullets etc. etc. etc. I made sure to use the same dimensions in terms of case length, etc. as well. The only difference was the weight of the virgin Remington brass which sorted to 10 grains heavier than the Nosler casings I had been using (which should have created more pressure theoretically). I shot two rounds of the load I had been using (each casing fired two times), which was enlarging the primer pockets on the Nosler brass. The primer pockets held on the Remington brass with no increase in internal diameter. I just hand primed these fireformed and fired 2x cases (for a total of 3x firings) and the primers seat with the same pressure of the original, virgin, unfired brass.
I am not here to beat on anyone -- or Nosler, the company that I think, for the most part, does things the "right" way (love their bullets, guns etc.). But it wasn't the reamer dimensions or the the way the gunsmith cut the chamber. Nosler brass in the 280AI configuration is too soft and prone to primer pocket loosening from the first firing ( and I have brass from multiple lots). Now, you should know that I have 500 casings of Nosler in the 204 Ruger configuration that I will continue to use ,no problems with them, even when I run pressures hunting in warmer temps. But their supplier of 280AI brass needs to re-think their formula or pour a heavier, heartier lot. Until that time, I will be forced to fireform from Remington and sort (cull) by weight, length and concentricity. This is one thing that Nosler does right on their brass. Virtually eliminating the need for this process. Lets hope Nosler listens and looks into this...