jagermeister
Beginner
- Jun 1, 2012
- 167
- 0
After considering a few options (included a new rifle…) I have come to the conclusion that the best option for my case would be to get another barrel (the third one…) for my Rifle.
I’ve had this rifle for a while.
It is a hunting super lightweight single shot break open, that allows barrel changing in a blink of an eye and no tools needed.
A dream to carry up the Mountains, especially on those tough hikes with a heavy backpack.
It needs, of course, dedicated mount and optic for each barrel, but I’ve got that already…..
Not easy to shoot, due to its thin shape and lightweight, but once mastered, capable of sub Moa accuracy.
Well, the options I am considering would be based on the same barrel profile and length….and cost !
Recoil won’t be an issue as I’m going to put a muzzle break on, which then will not make any substantial difference between those calibers.
Intended use would be long range hunting on big game (comparable size animals ranging from a small Whitetail to a large Elk…).
Possible Caliber choices as follows :
1. 7 mm. Blaser Mag. – 1 : 9,5” 26” barrel
2. 7 Rem.Mag. – 1 : 9,5” 26” barrel
3. .300 Win.Mag. – 1 : 11” 26” barrel
4. 300 Blaser Mag. – 1 : 11” 26” barrel
5. 8 x 68 S - 1 : 11” 26” barrel
Which one would you suggest ?
Most importantly, which one would you consider the most accurate ?
Just a few “instinctive” personal considerations…..
• For bullets availability, I’d take the 8 x 68S off the list…..
• For Reloading equipment/brass availability, I’d also take the two Blaser Magnum off this list….
• Comparing downrange energy performance on the biggest Critters, I’d take the 7 Rem. off this list….
There you have it ! But that was me….what would YOU consider in choosing one over the others ?
I’d like to also hear your thoughts….
Given the twist rates, what would the heaviest possible bullets to be well stabilized for each caliber ?
I’d guess 200/210 for the .300 and 162/168 for the 7 mm….
I intend to handload, thus commercially available ammo’s will not matter…
Thank you in advance for your input.
JM

I’ve had this rifle for a while.
It is a hunting super lightweight single shot break open, that allows barrel changing in a blink of an eye and no tools needed.
A dream to carry up the Mountains, especially on those tough hikes with a heavy backpack.
It needs, of course, dedicated mount and optic for each barrel, but I’ve got that already…..
Not easy to shoot, due to its thin shape and lightweight, but once mastered, capable of sub Moa accuracy.
Well, the options I am considering would be based on the same barrel profile and length….and cost !
Recoil won’t be an issue as I’m going to put a muzzle break on, which then will not make any substantial difference between those calibers.
Intended use would be long range hunting on big game (comparable size animals ranging from a small Whitetail to a large Elk…).
Possible Caliber choices as follows :
1. 7 mm. Blaser Mag. – 1 : 9,5” 26” barrel
2. 7 Rem.Mag. – 1 : 9,5” 26” barrel
3. .300 Win.Mag. – 1 : 11” 26” barrel
4. 300 Blaser Mag. – 1 : 11” 26” barrel
5. 8 x 68 S - 1 : 11” 26” barrel
Which one would you suggest ?
Most importantly, which one would you consider the most accurate ?
Just a few “instinctive” personal considerations…..
• For bullets availability, I’d take the 8 x 68S off the list…..
• For Reloading equipment/brass availability, I’d also take the two Blaser Magnum off this list….
• Comparing downrange energy performance on the biggest Critters, I’d take the 7 Rem. off this list….
There you have it ! But that was me….what would YOU consider in choosing one over the others ?
I’d like to also hear your thoughts….
Given the twist rates, what would the heaviest possible bullets to be well stabilized for each caliber ?
I’d guess 200/210 for the .300 and 162/168 for the 7 mm….
I intend to handload, thus commercially available ammo’s will not matter…
Thank you in advance for your input.
JM