bullet
Handloader
- Dec 26, 2007
- 4,975
- 18
Yes, I am trying the E-Tip again. :shock: I know it was a bust in my 30-06, but my 30-06 did not like a lot of bullets and my 300Win Mag seems to like what ever I throw at it. Of course the E-Tip will be the biggest test my Savage 116FHSS 300Win Mag will have to face. I have already loaded the 180gr & 150gr E-Tips for a trip to the range Monday Morning. If I get these two E-Tips to shoot well that would be seven loads for my 300Win Mag making my 300 a very, very versatile rifle having loads that would be tailored to load specific game and field conditions.
Even though I do have a very accurate Barnes load 180gr TTSX, I do not really like Barnes after using them over a four year period. I hope to get the E-Tip to shoot because the expanding cavity in the E-Tip is deeper and more efficient in producing a greater diameter mushroom frontal area of expansion. Even though in a media test the 180gr E-Tip only went 11" as apposed to the 15" that the TTSX penetrated the wound cavity was much bigger and the meplate of the expanded E-Tip was greater in size.
Below is a picture of a recovered E-Tip, BT and TTSX after the test that was done by person on another forum, and you will notice the larger mushroom produced with E-Tip and yet the weight retention is the same as the TTSX . I think I will like the effects on game better with the E-Tip than I liked and witness over the four years I used the TSX. That is why I am trying for an accurate load with the E-Tips.
The 150gr E-Tip will serve as my varmint and deer copper bullet and the 180gr E-Tip for larger game using a copper bullet. Also, I have an acquaintance who has had better wound channels and exits holes with more devastation inside the game in his comparison of the E-Tip, against the TSX and TTSX over the last three years of trying both on the same kind of game. Also, he has experience less fouling with the E-Tip and down range accuracy at distance has been very good due to the BC of the E-Tip being greater than that of the TTSX providing more energy and momentum at distance than the TTSX. Now granted it is harder to find that accurate load with the E-Tip than with the TTSX, but if I can find that accuracy, then I think I might be much happier with its effect on game in the field. Note, I said, "I think." This depends first on getting them to shoot below 3/4" in my rifle as far as I am concerned then if so I will test them in the field this coming year.
It these shoot good and kill game like I think they will, the whole world will know how good the E-Tip is, but if they don't shoot I will just keep the results to myself except letting this forum know how they do.
Recovered 180gr E-Tip and then 180g BT and on the far right the 180gr TTSX.
Even though I do have a very accurate Barnes load 180gr TTSX, I do not really like Barnes after using them over a four year period. I hope to get the E-Tip to shoot because the expanding cavity in the E-Tip is deeper and more efficient in producing a greater diameter mushroom frontal area of expansion. Even though in a media test the 180gr E-Tip only went 11" as apposed to the 15" that the TTSX penetrated the wound cavity was much bigger and the meplate of the expanded E-Tip was greater in size.
Below is a picture of a recovered E-Tip, BT and TTSX after the test that was done by person on another forum, and you will notice the larger mushroom produced with E-Tip and yet the weight retention is the same as the TTSX . I think I will like the effects on game better with the E-Tip than I liked and witness over the four years I used the TSX. That is why I am trying for an accurate load with the E-Tips.
The 150gr E-Tip will serve as my varmint and deer copper bullet and the 180gr E-Tip for larger game using a copper bullet. Also, I have an acquaintance who has had better wound channels and exits holes with more devastation inside the game in his comparison of the E-Tip, against the TSX and TTSX over the last three years of trying both on the same kind of game. Also, he has experience less fouling with the E-Tip and down range accuracy at distance has been very good due to the BC of the E-Tip being greater than that of the TTSX providing more energy and momentum at distance than the TTSX. Now granted it is harder to find that accurate load with the E-Tip than with the TTSX, but if I can find that accuracy, then I think I might be much happier with its effect on game in the field. Note, I said, "I think." This depends first on getting them to shoot below 3/4" in my rifle as far as I am concerned then if so I will test them in the field this coming year.
It these shoot good and kill game like I think they will, the whole world will know how good the E-Tip is, but if they don't shoot I will just keep the results to myself except letting this forum know how they do.
Recovered 180gr E-Tip and then 180g BT and on the far right the 180gr TTSX.