Quick load request

salmonchaser

Handloader
Dec 13, 2013
4,921
4,698
My Girl friends son had a buddy load him some 180 grain Bergers for his 7mm Remington mag. The box indicated H1000 but no indication how many grains. Apparently the load shot very well.
Any help appreciated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
If he has any left pull a bullet and weigh the powder charge. Also measure OAL first so you know the seating depth.
 
That would have been too easy:) between them they think 69 grains, cause " we like them hot"COL just enough to fit in the magazine. He showed me a 300 yard target that was an easy 1/2 MOA


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I lengthened them to 3.4 COAL

Code:
Cartridge          : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet             : .284, 180, Berger Hunt VLD #28502
Useable Case Capaci: 73.124 grain H2O = 4.748 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.400 inch = 86.36 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.883% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-08.8   94    62.91   2587    2676   43369  12228     97.6    1.449
-07.9   95    63.52   2614    2732   44702  12338     97.9    1.428
-07.1   96    64.13   2641    2789   46080  12444     98.2    1.407
-06.2   97    64.73   2668    2846   47505  12544     98.5    1.387
-05.3   98    65.34   2695    2903   48977  12640     98.8    1.367
-04.4   99    65.95   2722    2962   50502  12729     99.0    1.348
-03.5  100    66.56   2749    3021   52077  12814     99.3    1.328  ! Near Maximum !
-02.6  101    67.17   2776    3080   53702  12893     99.4    1.310  ! Near Maximum !
-01.8  102    67.78   2803    3140   55395  12965     99.6    1.291  ! Near Maximum !
-00.9  103    68.39   2829    3200   57144  13032     99.7    1.272  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  103    69.00   2856    3261   58953  13093     99.8    1.254  ! Near Maximum !
+00.9  104    69.61   2883    3322   60826  13148     99.9    1.236  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.8  105    70.22   2909    3383   62770  13196    100.0    1.219  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.6  106    70.83   2936    3445   64784  13238    100.0    1.202  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5  107    71.44   2962    3507   66873  13274    100.0    1.184  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.4  108    72.05   2989    3570   69040  13309    100.0    1.168  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    103    69.00   2927    3425   65353  12805    100.0    1.202  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    103    69.00   2770    3066   53030  13184     98.4    1.314  ! Near Maximum !
 
Take it to 3.3 you get this:

Code:
Cartridge          : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet             : .284, 180, Berger Hunt VLD #28502
Useable Case Capaci: 71.524 grain H2O = 4.644 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.300 inch = 83.82 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.883% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-08.8   96    62.91   2621    2746   45336  12159     97.9    1.418
-07.9   97    63.52   2648    2804   46767  12263     98.3    1.398
-07.1   98    64.13   2676    2862   48245  12362     98.6    1.377
-06.2   99    64.73   2703    2921   49774  12455     98.8    1.357
-05.3  100    65.34   2731    2980   51358  12542     99.1    1.337
-04.4  101    65.95   2758    3040   52998  12624     99.3    1.318  ! Near Maximum !
-03.5  102    66.56   2785    3101   54697  12700     99.5    1.298  ! Near Maximum !
-02.6  103    67.17   2813    3162   56455  12770     99.6    1.280  ! Near Maximum !
-01.8  104    67.78   2840    3223   58280  12834     99.8    1.261  ! Near Maximum !
-00.9  105    68.39   2867    3285   60171  12892     99.9    1.243  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  106    69.00   2894    3348   62133  12943     99.9    1.225  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+00.9  107    69.61   2921    3411   64161  12987    100.0    1.207  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.8  108    70.22   2948    3474   66281  13025    100.0    1.189  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.6  109    70.83   2975    3538   68474  13059    100.0    1.172  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5  110    71.44   3002    3602   70753  13092    100.0    1.155  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.4  110    72.05   3029    3666   73120  13123    100.0    1.138  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    106    69.00   2964    3511   68909  12639    100.0    1.174  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    106    69.00   2809    3153   55866  13082     98.7    1.282  ! Near Maximum !


3.35 shows this
Code:
Cartridge          : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet             : .284, 180, Berger Hunt VLD #28502
Useable Case Capaci: 72.324 grain H2O = 4.696 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.350 inch = 85.09 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.883% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-08.8   95    62.91   2604    2710   44330  12195     97.8    1.434
-07.9   96    63.52   2631    2767   45708  12302     98.1    1.413
-07.1   97    64.13   2658    2825   47135  12404     98.4    1.392
-06.2   98    64.73   2686    2883   48610  12501     98.7    1.372
-05.3   99    65.34   2713    2941   50136  12592     98.9    1.352
-04.4  100    65.95   2740    3001   51716  12678     99.2    1.333
-03.5  101    66.56   2767    3060   53351  12759     99.4    1.314  ! Near Maximum !
-02.6  102    67.17   2794    3120   55044  12833     99.5    1.295  ! Near Maximum !
-01.8  103    67.78   2821    3181   56795  12901     99.7    1.276  ! Near Maximum !
-00.9  104    68.39   2848    3242   58614  12964     99.8    1.257  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  105    69.00   2875    3304   60497  13020     99.9    1.240  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+00.9  106    69.61   2902    3366   62447  13070    100.0    1.222  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.8  106    70.22   2929    3428   64473  13113    100.0    1.204  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.6  107    70.83   2955    3491   66572  13150    100.0    1.187  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5  108    71.44   2982    3554   68752  13184    100.0    1.170  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.4  109    72.05   3009    3618   71015  13217    100.0    1.153  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    105    69.00   2945    3467   67080  12723    100.0    1.188  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    105    69.00   2789    3109   54407  13135     98.5    1.298  ! Near Maximum !

3.45 this
Code:
Cartridge          : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet             : .284, 180, Berger Hunt VLD #28502
Useable Case Capaci: 73.925 grain H2O = 4.800 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.450 inch = 87.63 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.883% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-08.8   93    62.91   2571    2642   42455  12258     97.4    1.464
-07.9   94    63.52   2598    2697   43745  12372     97.7    1.443
-07.1   95    64.13   2625    2753   45078  12481     98.1    1.422
-06.2   96    64.73   2651    2810   46455  12585     98.4    1.402
-05.3   97    65.34   2678    2867   47878  12684     98.7    1.382
-04.4   98    65.95   2705    2924   49350  12778     98.9    1.363
-03.5   99    66.56   2731    2982   50869  12866     99.1    1.343
-02.6  100    67.17   2758    3040   52443  12949     99.3    1.324  ! Near Maximum !
-01.8  101    67.78   2785    3099   54068  13026     99.5    1.305  ! Near Maximum !
-00.9  101    68.39   2811    3159   55751  13097     99.7    1.287  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  102    69.00   2838    3218   57495  13163     99.8    1.269  ! Near Maximum !
+00.9  103    69.61   2864    3279   59296  13222     99.9    1.251  ! Near Maximum !
+01.8  104    70.22   2891    3339   61165  13275     99.9    1.233  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.6  105    70.83   2917    3400   63097  13322    100.0    1.216  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5  106    71.44   2943    3462   65102  13362    100.0    1.199  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.4  107    72.05   2969    3524   67179  13399    100.0    1.182  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    102    69.00   2909    3383   63723  12885    100.0    1.215  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    102    69.00   2751    3024   51729  13231     98.2    1.329
 
Thank you, I thought 69 grains might be getting warm. Will start working on this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thankyou will probably be next week before I got started. Still driving around the state to see relatives. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
...7271
Ran a few velocity tests today for comparison, 3.4 oal. 24 inch barrel

66 gr. H1000 2880fps
66.5. 2880
67. 2895
67.5. 2900
68. 2938
68.5. 2969
69. 2989

The 66.5 load had the smallest standard deviation, 3.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Compared to quick load I'm + 100 FPS across the board.
Wondering if my chronograph is giving me good data.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
salmonchaser":1skgscp3 said:
Compared to quick load I'm + 100 FPS across the board.
Wondering if my chronograph is giving me good data.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't doubt your chrono just yet. Different lots of H1000 will vary quite a lot. How does the brass look at 69 grains? I'd think 2850-2900 would be comfortable for a 7 Mag. How long is the magazine on his rifle?
 
Brass looked fine, nothing obvious. I measured it just above the belt compared to a once fired factory brass.
The numbers are the same on my calipers.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The magazine is approximately 3.45. The loaded rounds just fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'd say you're good then SC. If you like Bergers it sounds like a good load.
 
salmonchaser":mbdn7eff said:
Brass looked fine, nothing obvious. I measured it just above the belt compared to a once fired factory brass.
The numbers are the same on my calipers.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a digital micrometer I would measure them with that since you can get spring back with calipers. I use them when I really want to get close at measuring round objects, Digital because I have trouble reading the small hash marks with out a magnifier. :mrgreen:
 
SC,
This one is pretty good across the board. It misses on the 66 load but the rest look pretty much in line.

Code:
Cartridge          : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet             : .284, 180, Berger Hunt VLD #28502
Useable Case Capaci: 73.124 grain H2O = 4.748 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.400 inch = 86.36 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H1000 ?

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.746% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-07.5   93    62.00   2661    2831   43180  12859     98.1    1.410
-06.7   94    62.50   2684    2880   44249  12956     98.3    1.393
-06.0   94    63.00   2707    2929   45348  13051     98.5    1.377
-05.2   95    63.50   2730    2979   46476  13142     98.8    1.360
-04.5   96    64.00   2753    3029   47634  13230     99.0    1.344
-03.7   97    64.50   2776    3079   48824  13314     99.1    1.329
-03.0   97    65.00   2799    3130   50043  13394     99.3    1.313
-02.2   98    65.50   2821    3182   51303  13471     99.4    1.297
-01.5   99    66.00   2844    3233   52592  13544     99.6    1.282  ! Near Maximum !
-00.7  100    66.50   2867    3285   53920  13613     99.7    1.267  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  100    67.00   2890    3337   55284  13678     99.8    1.252  ! Near Maximum !
+00.7  101    67.50   2912    3390   56685  13739     99.9    1.238  ! Near Maximum !
+01.5  102    68.00   2935    3443   58129  13796     99.9    1.223  ! Near Maximum !
+02.2  103    68.50   2958    3496   59612  13849    100.0    1.209  ! Near Maximum !
+03.0  103    69.00   2980    3550   61138  13897    100.0    1.195  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.7  104    69.50   3003    3604   62709  13942    100.0    1.181  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    100    67.00   2963    3508   61259  13393    100.0    1.200  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    100    67.00   2801    3136   49757  13746     98.2    1.312
 
BTW, on the 69 load I think you're fine anyway but I'm sure you checked for signs anyhow. QL gets a little touchy right around what it thinks is the max. :grin:
 
Thankyou, now to figure out what all this is telling me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
SJB358":rpbsci1l said:
I'd say you're good then SC. If you like Bergers it sounds like a good load.

Actually Scotty, in spite of contrary evidence to my opinions on Berger's I'd rather my young friend wanted to use partitions or accubonds. :)



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top