- Thread starter
- #21
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
preacher":18nac272 said:Yes sir! That's it...what do those figures mean as far as real pressure goes? My chrono figures showed "exactly" 2550fps av for this load, so we are spot on!
preacher":znsxvq4i said:Wow. I am having a hard time believing I am around 70K with that load, ha. Oh well, I doubt I will ever use that powder again. I really want to try H322. Even Hodgdens Data for the standard Whelen shows 52gr of H322/250 for 48,500 CUP. IF H322 is indeed close to 2015, how can 53.5/2015 be 70K yet 52 of similar H322 just be 48.5K? I'm just trying to figure this out,ha. I "know" my 200TTSX/2950 is OK, and proven on elk sized game and I will use it 99% of the time, BUT...I'm kind of bumfuzzled. To get back to 2600/250 you guys think maybe I should fall back to 4064 or 4895?
DrMike":h1ty9oka said:Mildly over pressure.
Cartridge : .35 Whelen Ack. Imp.
Bullet : .358, 310, Woodleigh SN WeldCore 54
Useable Case Capaci: 63.074 grain H2O = 4.095 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.430 inch = 87.12 mm
Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-15
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-20.0 76 44.00 1891 2462 32570 6824 95.8 1.635
-18.0 78 45.10 1934 2574 34590 7000 96.6 1.592
-16.0 79 46.20 1976 2687 36725 7169 97.3 1.550
-14.0 81 47.30 2018 2803 38982 7330 97.9 1.509
-12.0 83 48.40 2060 2920 41367 7482 98.4 1.467
-10.0 85 49.50 2101 3039 43887 7625 98.9 1.427
-08.0 87 50.60 2142 3159 46552 7758 99.2 1.388
-06.0 89 51.70 2183 3281 49369 7882 99.5 1.351 ! Near Maximum !
-04.0 91 52.80 2224 3404 52349 7995 99.8 1.316 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 93 53.90 2264 3528 55501 8097 99.9 1.282 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 95 55.00 2304 3654 58838 8187 100.0 1.249 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 96 56.10 2344 3781 62372 8268 100.0 1.217 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 98 57.20 2383 3908 66117 8345 100.0 1.186 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.0 100 58.30 2422 4037 70088 8421 100.0 1.157 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 102 59.40 2460 4166 74302 8494 100.0 1.129 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 104 60.50 2499 4297 78778 8565 100.0 1.101 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 95 55.00 2379 3896 69358 7857 100.0 1.169 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 95 55.00 2192 3306 48475 8330 97.5 1.355
Nothing that would cause me great heartburn.
RiverRider":2elyvrb3 said:I agree with Scotty wholeheartedly.
I've read through this thread and did not see any mention of an actual water capacity measurement. It can make all the difference in the world. Case in point: that slick new 70 Super Grade I snagged a couple of months ago? My load for the older .280 pushed a 150 Partition to about 2920 fps (at approximately 58000 psi). In the 70, that same load only yields 2840 fps. The 70 has a very generous chamber and my fireformed brass holds 70.4 grains of water, but when fireformed in the older rifle holds 69.0 grains of water. What I'm trying to say is that QL will give you what I *believe to be* a good approximation of pressure, but the case's water capacity MUST be known and input in order to get good info. Like they've been saying about computers and programs for decades...garbage in, garbage out.
preacher":1pt82dbh said:Its moot now, having this baby converted to 358 Norma...whoopee!!!