So Which one for the 30-378?

[FOTIS]

This? 200 AccuBond





or this ? 175 Barnes LRX

 

[DrMike]

I should imagine that either load will work quite well for about any game you could wish to hunt. You have a measurably higher muzzle energy represented by the AccuBond load contra the LRX load (~400 ft-lbs) which could tip the scales. However, either load generates over two tons of energy at the muzzle, which is a lot. We like bug holes, but out to some very long ranges, a 0.5 MOA will deliver enough accuracy to ensure a clean hit. Yeah, my preference would be for the AccuBond, though I wouldn't be particularly concerned about using the LRX.

 

[JD338]

I'm with Mike, 200 gr AB.

JD338

 

[Thebear_78]

I'd go with the LRX


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Dr. Vette]

LRX is faster and almost half the size.
I'd compare them at 200 yards, and also compare ES/SD.
If the LRX maintains its lead then it's an easy win.

 

[6mm Remington]

AccuBond!!

 

[Guy Miner]

Shoot 'em both at longer ranges. This isn't your short-range/brush country rifle...

Out to 500 or 600 on targets should tell you more about your loads, for longish range hunting.

I like 'em both from what I see. That LRX load is danged accurate! But give 'em a try out farther...

Guy

 

[Thankful Otter]

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin

either-or

nice shooting

 

[DrMike]

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin

1,328 (or 2,721 on Sundays)

 

[Thankful Otter]

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin

1,328 (or 2,721 on Sundays)

Finally ! I have been asking this question for years and no one knew. And I am not surprised that you had the answer Dr Mike LOL well played BTW,

 

[Europe]

Dr Mike, Cheyenne, you brought a smile to an old ladies face--love it,

 

[DON]

I'm with Guy like he said!!

Don