Guy Miner
Master Loader
- Apr 6, 2006
- 17,836
- 6,312
Fun question - and I think we all know there is no single answer. Many, many different ways to take mule deer & pronghorn at longish ranges. I tend to think that the typical "western" hunting rifle grew out of such hunting, deer & antelope at 300 - 400 yards... Hence the popularity of scoped, bolt action rifles, in good cartridges such as the .270 Win, etc...
For me, it's been just mule deer, no pronghorn hunts yet. I've had a good string of luck the past few years with my .25-06 Rem 700 CDL, topped with a simple 6x Leupold. Flat shooting. Accurate. Very lethal. Very light recoil. It's worked in Wyoming and Washington, very well.
My .300 WSM Model 70 is heavier, more accurate, more powerful, and likely a better choice as the ranges stretch out - but it hasn't produced for me - yet.
Nothing wrong with a good old .30-06 or .270, or one of the 7's or a .30 cal magnum for the chore either. Or, if you go by "Pop" you just might think a .416 is the ideal rifle! :grin:
For me, it's been just mule deer, no pronghorn hunts yet. I've had a good string of luck the past few years with my .25-06 Rem 700 CDL, topped with a simple 6x Leupold. Flat shooting. Accurate. Very lethal. Very light recoil. It's worked in Wyoming and Washington, very well.
My .300 WSM Model 70 is heavier, more accurate, more powerful, and likely a better choice as the ranges stretch out - but it hasn't produced for me - yet.
Nothing wrong with a good old .30-06 or .270, or one of the 7's or a .30 cal magnum for the chore either. Or, if you go by "Pop" you just might think a .416 is the ideal rifle! :grin: