Guy Miner":3exrnmpw said:ShadeTree":3exrnmpw said:Thanks for weighing in all. I done some reading last evening and apparently the 35 whelen on a springfield action was high up on the list for Elmer Keith. So that combination has a long history. The 338-06 is also interesting for sure!
Ya, it's a classic sporter just the way it sits, but you intend to re-barrel, and don't want to keep it a 30-06 so I think one of the two, a 338-06 or a 35 Whelen would keep it classic, be a simple conversion needing nothing more than a new barrel, and would give a real bump-up in bullet diameter for things like bear & elk.
Nice rifle, and seems it's about to get nicer!![]()
Regards, Guy
I am with Guy and the others, the 35 Whelen is a really classic deal in a Springfield. I don't get to wrapped around bullets as there are literally more available than I would feel like testing. Chances are you will find 1 or 2 you really like and shoot it. With todays powders, 2600 with a 250 and 2700 with a 225 cover just about everything and let me tell you, if elk and bear are on your hunt list, they make good holes and really break stuff down pretty quick. I am a huge fan of the 35 caliber cartridges and have a decent bunch of them. I also hunt a bunch with my 338 Win and can't tell much difference between either as far as wound channels or capabilities.
In your case it may be enough to set the barrel back a thread and do an Ackley. Could clear up your chamber issue. JES charges about 250 the last time I did one and it might be a way to experiment with it before you jump whole hog into a rebarrel. I am not typically an Ackley guy, but in your case it might be a good option since it might clean up your chamber and breath some new life into the rifle, plus give you some time with the cartridge to see if you really like it.