TXbaldhunter
Handloader
- May 12, 2007
- 406
- 339
I was looking at the bullet lengths the other day.I seem to always have a little better accuracy with 168gr Ballistic Tips over the 165gr Ballistic Tips in most of my rifles.I just find the 168gr just easier to get to shoot better.You would think there wouldn't be that must difference in just three grains,but the difference is more about the length than the weight.I'll usually get about 30fps gain in velocity with the 165gr over the 168gr.
165gr B.T is 1.290 OAL. BC 0.475
168gr B.T. is 1.307 OAL. BC 0.490
165gr A.B.is 1.308 OAL. BC 0.475(Not to sure how the BC can be the same as 165gr B.T.)
Now notice,the 168gr B.T. is almost identical in length as the 165gr A.B.I had heard when the 168gr bullet first came out,it was supposed to have a thicker jacket than the 165gr,that would explain the length increase too,more copper vs lead.The performance between the 165gr B.T. and the 168gr B.T. on deer I've shot with them,I could not tell any difference,both bullets killed deer DRT.
165gr B.T is 1.290 OAL. BC 0.475
168gr B.T. is 1.307 OAL. BC 0.490
165gr A.B.is 1.308 OAL. BC 0.475(Not to sure how the BC can be the same as 165gr B.T.)
Now notice,the 168gr B.T. is almost identical in length as the 165gr A.B.I had heard when the 168gr bullet first came out,it was supposed to have a thicker jacket than the 165gr,that would explain the length increase too,more copper vs lead.The performance between the 165gr B.T. and the 168gr B.T. on deer I've shot with them,I could not tell any difference,both bullets killed deer DRT.