- Oct 30, 2004
- 24,984
- 5,121
Guy Miner":t9fhktw8 said:Fotis - have you tried any cast bullet loads through that fine .44 revolver?
just made some up 240 with 6 gr trail boss. 44 special loads for fun
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Guy Miner":t9fhktw8 said:Fotis - have you tried any cast bullet loads through that fine .44 revolver?
FOTIS":uch2sjns said:Guy Miner":uch2sjns said:Fotis - have you tried any cast bullet loads through that fine .44 revolver?
just made some up 240 with 6 gr trail boss. 44 special loads for fun
Sheesh! Here I am, blissfully liking posts and not looking at dates.I know this post is Kinda old ?
But why do you use CCI 300 with AA9 !
I always used Mag primers with slow burners
H110/296 and AA9 . CCI 350 is my preferred primer in 44 mag with these powders.
Over the years Dan Wesson / S &W / Colt / Ruger Black Hawk and Redhawk all in 44 Mag . The DW and Rugers are the only ones survived Heavy Bear loads. Colt Anconda failed and the SW 629/29 failed also had too reduce the load level. Went to Ruger on great advice and never looked back. I deal with bear every year here normally carry my Glock but bring out my Ruger Redhawk to dust off in the field occasionally. Yes agree Ruger Redhawk 4.2” is a hunk of Steel.This is all very interesting. Sometimes it does good to resurrect an old thread. I think this is one that needs to come up every once in a while.
When I look at the photo of Guy's ammo, I think that the bullet is the Lyman #429241 which Lyman slightly altered which angered Mr. Keith. as they rounds the inside of the lube groove for easier production. I don't know if RCBS is still making molds but their #44-250-SWC is an exact clone of Elmer Keith's original design. There is also a similar mold that takes a gas check as well. All the bullets mentioned shoot very well in my .44 Spl. and Magnums.
I haven't done much with the .44's and I have several hundred .44 mags to pull and reload. I did a stupid thing as few years back and the loads are super hot and barely safe in a Redhawk if that. I can sve the brass and primer but the bullet and gas check will probably bee ruined. I ran a pretty tight crimp on that ammo so may have to use wire cutters or something similar. It was just one of those days when I should have been doing something else, like maybe knitting or something similar.
I'm getting too old to shoot super hot loads anyway. I'm thinking the arthritis in my hands is gonna complain very loudly if I do shoot stiff loads.
FWIW, My S&W 629 never could handle Elmer's load of 22gr. 2400/ 240/250 gr. bullet. It took two trips to S&W after which I semi-retired the gun. My Rugers however, from an original Blackhawk, several super Blackhawks, and a couple of Redhawks thrived quite well using Elmer's load. My only complaint about the Redhawks is they're just too damn heavy. Still and all, I still love the .44 Mag. and probably will always have a few hanging around.
Paul B.
I have two Redhawks, a 5.5" and a 7.5". Either one needs a carriage as they have mass and weight. Definitely hell for stout. I wouldn't mind finding a 4.2" just to complete the set.Over the years Dan Wesson / S &W / Colt / Ruger Black Hawk and Redhawk all in 44 Mag . The DW and Rugers are the only ones survived Heavy Bear loads. Colt Anconda failed and the SW 629/29 failed also had too reduce the load level. Went to Ruger on great advice and never looked back. I deal with bear every year here normally carry my Glock but bring out my Ruger Redhawk to dust off in the field occasionally. Yes agree Ruger Redhawk 4.2” is a hunk of Steel.