Dialing vs Holdover

[IdahoCTD]

I personally like to use crosshairs because its fasters and you dont have to worry about where your dial is if you get multiple chances in quick succession at different distance. I've had it happened a lot and you get bogged down figuring out where you dials are from the last place/distance you dialed. You just have to know at what power your reticle is correct if your shooting SFP scopes, which I prefer. I run TMOA reticles in Leupold VX6's and MOAR-T reticles in Nightforce scopes.

 

[IdahoCTD]

Two other scopes that I am interested in trying, but haven't had the chance to yet, are the Leica Amplus 6 3-18x44i BDC MOA and Zeiss V-4 4-16x44 #68 ZBi Illum - ASV-EASV-W Ballistic Turret.
Of the two, I am leaning more towards the Zeiss as I thinkt the illuminated cross might be nicer for most of my hunting vs the smaller illuminated dot on the crosshair of the Leica.
Anyone tried these? Or compared the two?
Thoughts?

i just mounted one of my kids Leica Amplus 6 3-18×44's on a 7prc with a Defiance Classic action and a Krieger barrel. I'm in the middle of chambering the second 7prc for my youngest son now but got distracted by the BSU game. It will wear the same scope.

 

[mosesdad]

An interesting topic of conversation has started in another thread, and I thought I would ask my question here instead, to respect the OPs original thread there...

For those who dial and shoot, or those who have holdover BDC type reticles (B&C, TDS, BRH, etc.), what are the advantages to you in your style of aiming when shooting and/or hunting?
Or do you use both, depending on your style of shooting at the moment? (Target shooting vs hunting)

Myself, I love the Leupold Boone & Crocket reticles, and the older Kahles/Swarovski TDS reticles. As a hunter first, when in the field, I find this faster to adjust my aiming point on the animal in that I can just range, aim and shoot vs range, dial and shoot. But this just my preferred practice.
While many of my Leupolds have the option for the CDS cap to be cut for free for the rifle's preferred load, I have not done so as yet.

I have just acquired a couple of used VX-6HD scopes, one a 3-18x44 with the illuminated B&C reticle, and the other a 3-18x50 with the illuminated Varmint Hunters reticle, as they illuminate the entire BDC portion of the reticle. Having two of the illuminated B&C reticles already (a 2-12x42 and a 3-18x50), I like them a lot for their better quality glass and improved coatings, for low light hunting scenarios, as I can dial down the intensity of the illumination so that it doesn't overwhelm the aiming point on the target animal in low light conditions. And the illuminated reticle stands out better than a black reticle, especially on darker animals such as bear or moose, in the thick timber, or lower light conditions.

The newer Gen 2 sopes only illuminate the centre crosshair, not the entire BDC portion of the reticle. I can see where the smaller illuminated cross, just at the crosshair would be nicer as it would not cover so much of the aiming point on a target under lower light conditions, and the CDS dial would negate the use of the BDC portion of the reticle when you have more time to range, dial and shoot at long distance targets where the additional accuracy potential can be appreciated more. Not owning one as yet, I have no direct comparison from the field to judge the pros and cons between the two for myself.
The biggest advantage here (to me) is that it is a toolless system for setting your Zero. I like this...I would love to get a Gen 2, but the price of these scopes with the current exchange ratee and tariffs is very expensive here north of the border. And I am getting both of these used, excellent conditions scopes for the price of one new Gen 2.

With these two new-to-me scopes, as they will be going on my 25 Creedmoor, and the planned for the next build (a 257 AI Improved), And will be mainly for deer, sheep, and antelope in wide open spaces, I am wondering if I should order the CDS caps for more precise holds on longer shots (300-500 yards) under normal lighting conditions not requiring the illumination, and where I may have more time for the range, dial, shoot action, or target practice to verify the POIs and just get better at shooting the longer distances during practice in preparation for the hunts.
Thoughts on this from those who practice this method?

As for using a bdc or etched reticle
I prefer a custom turret calibrated to your particular load
Etched reticles work but are usually on second focal plane that needs to be dialed up to highest magnification or they dont work
A calibrated reticle relies on your ability to correctly identify the distance and elevation of target at any magnification

 

[SJB358]

Great topic. I started shooting further with the Leupold 6x42 with LR Dots which is the same spacing interval as a B&C. Worked fine out to 500 and 600 yards. I started using the 6x MQ SWFA and 3x9, both being able to dial or hold on the reticle.

The B&C or dotz worked fine but I hated the tweener distances. With fast stuff it wasn’t as bad but I just got to the point I’d rather hold center with a dialed correction vs holding off with a reticle.

To me I’ve heard about how fast a reticle is, and maybe the herd is right but with a B&C or Dots or TDS, you have to crank to the highest power usually and now you’re stuck with a limited field of view and not much to see when the shot goes off. Plus by the time you’ve cranked up the power to match the reticle for the shot, I’ve already glimpsed my drop chart and made my dope change. So I think it’s moot for me in speed. If I were engaging multiple targets at multiple ranges then yes, shooting the reticle is no doubt faster.

I’d rather shoot an elk or deer on 8 or 10x or so at 600 and be able to see what happens post shot vs being cranked to 15-18x and losing my situational awareness.

Today I use mostly FFP scopes with reticles I can shoot at timber/forest distances and crank up to the appropriate power to make the shot. My last few longer shots have been on about 8x of a 3-18 scope when I looked post shot. On paper, mag is nice but deer and elk are fairly big so I don’t need a ton. Plus I think no matter scopes quality, the image is always going to be brighter on the lower end, vs the upper end if that matter in your hunting.

 

[jimbires]

a couple more points were brought up , that I forgot about . I use my reticle scopes at max power . all my scopes are SFP scopes . I do not own a FFP scope . Leupold does have the magnification ring marked for the proper setting per velocity , I don't do that . I use max . by the time I set the power ring to the desired power , I could have dialed the scope turret . I've always like higher magnification for longer shots . so my thinking is , why would I turn the mag lower to make a longer shot .

yes you sure can zero the B&C reticle at any distance you desire . a few times I had a 300 yard zero for a certain hunt . the reticle spacing in yards gets goofy . I had to make a quick chart in the scope cap . it went something like ( just guessing here ) 300 , 360 , 440 , 580 . the numbers were not anything I could quickly remember . so there was no advantage to reticle speed . so I have been using a 200 yard zero . I think I've only used two different reticles , the Leupold B&C , and the Burris . they all work the same though .

these reticles work so well because they are mostly shorter range , 400 - 500 yards MAX . the CDS dials are more precise , a step above a reticle ,being they are cut to your particular combo . when I use a rangefinder with a reticle , CDS would be the same , I get the rangefinder to read the corrected distance in yards . when I'm dialing I get the rangefinder to give me the correction in MOA , since my dial up scopes have MOA knobs . I do not have any scope with CDS knobs . not that I don't like them , or think they are not good . if I dial , I'll use MOA . just me .

remember when using the reticle at in between distances , "splitting the reticle ". the bullet drops more in the second half of the distance . an example would be , the bullet will drop less from 500 - 550 yards , the bullet will drop more from 550 - 600 yards . this too is about unnoticeable at closer ranges .


if anyone has any particular questions , ask . there will be someone on here that can get you on the right path . this stuff is simple once ya dive in .


great discussion Fellas , I enjoy this stuff .