DrMike
Ballistician
- Nov 8, 2006
- 37,312
- 5,978
That is with one powder. There are other powders that would perhaps be better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Oldtrader3":2nn2yrbl said:Hitting any BG animal with a 250 gr, .366 bullet at 2700 fps would impress that animal greatly, IMHO.
beretzs":z3as8h2r said:BK":z3as8h2r said:I can name at least one other oddball around here!
Whoa Kurt, it is too early for name calling just yet. I think we have to wait till 1200L EST before we do that around here. That 9.3WSM does sound pretty cool though! Scotty
BK":20nt7tfi said:beretzs":20nt7tfi said:BK":20nt7tfi said:I can name at least one other oddball around here!
Whoa Kurt, it is too early for name calling just yet. I think we have to wait till 1200L EST before we do that around here. That 9.3WSM does sound pretty cool though! Scotty
Just pointing out the phrase "if you can't laugh at yourself..."
beretzs":1vs50ewe said:Oldtrader3":1vs50ewe said:Hitting any BG animal with a 250 gr, .366 bullet at 2700 fps would impress that animal greatly, IMHO.
Charlie, I think you would like the WSM's a bunch. They have good capacity and most of the ones I have came across have been very good shooters with little work. Tough brass and just great performance from a 24" barrel. I know I am pretty wrapped up in them for the above reasons. I still like the regular WM cartridges, but if I had the WSM's back then, I wouldn't have the WM's I do now.. Scotty